which makes everything segfault and is unrecoverable without a live CD
and a lot of manual intervention.
A simple "does it boot" test in fact wouldn't have caught this, but a
"does it boot, then run prelink" (completely automatic as part of the
Koji build or AutoQA acceptance) would have.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#)
http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
09-29-2010, 02:37 PM
Jesse Keating
Another bug that would have been caught if packages went through a boot/acceptance test
"Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com> wrote:
>If you've been following updates to F14 alpha/beta, you'll undoubtedly
>have been hit by:
>
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638091
>
>which makes everything segfault and is unrecoverable without a live CD
>and a lot of manual intervention.
>
>A simple "does it boot" test in fact wouldn't have caught this, but a
>"does it boot, then run prelink" (completely automatic as part of the
>Koji build or AutoQA acceptance) would have.
>
You say this as if we weren't working hard to get to being able to run these tests and block builds accordingly ...
--
Sent from my Android phone. Please excuse my brevity.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Another bug that would have been caught if packages went through a boot/acceptance test
