Meeting started by poelcat at 21:01:35 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-09-22/fedora-meeting.2010-09-22-21.01.log.html
.
* review of release criteria and open bugs (poelcat, 21:05:24)
* adamw and jlaska here for qa (poelcat, 21:07:18)
* SMParrish here for devel/FESCo (poelcat, 21:07:28)
* dgilmore representing releng (poelcat, 21:07:38)
* brunowolff is here for Spins SIG (brunowolff, 21:08:00)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_14_Beta_RC3_Install
<--- install test matrix (adamw, 21:08:11)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_14_Beta_RC3_Desktop
<--- desktop test matrix (adamw, 21:08:25)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=611991&hide_resolved=1
<--- beta blocker list (adamw, 21:08:49)
* AGREED: 627789 is not a beta blocker (adamw, 21:12:54)
* IDEA: create release criteria asserting some level of functionality
of livecd-tools (jlaska, 21:13:03)
* AGREED: move https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627789 to
f14blocker (poelcat, 21:15:00)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_13_Final_RC3_Install
(adamw, 21:19:50)
* AGREED: publishing a documented updates.img with a fix for 635887 is
an acceptable workaround, move 635887 to be a final blocker (adamw,
21:25:48)
* AGREED: 542255 is not a regression, is of minor impact, and the
question of non-default-spin bugs blocking releases requires further
discussion and clarification, so we will not block the beta for this
bug (adamw, 21:45:26)
* ACTION: there being no unresolved blocking issues or unmet release
criteria, Fedora 14 Beta is declared GOLD (poelcat, 21:55:34)
* open discussion (poelcat, 21:55:37)
Meeting ended at 21:58:31 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* there being no unresolved blocking issues or unmet release criteria,
Fedora 14 Beta is declared GOLD
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* there being no unresolved blocking issues or unmet release criteria,
Fedora 14 Beta is declared GOLD
Meeting started by poelcat at 21:01:35 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-09-22/fedora-meeting.2010-09-22-21.01.log.html
.
* review of release criteria and open bugs (poelcat, 21:05:24)
* adamw and jlaska here for qa (poelcat, 21:07:18)
* SMParrish here for devel/FESCo (poelcat, 21:07:28)
* dgilmore representing releng (poelcat, 21:07:38)
* brunowolff is here for Spins SIG (brunowolff, 21:08:00)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_14_Beta_RC3_Install
<--- install test matrix (adamw, 21:08:11)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_14_Beta_RC3_Desktop
<--- desktop test matrix (adamw, 21:08:25)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=611991&hide_resolved=1
<--- beta blocker list (adamw, 21:08:49)
* AGREED: 627789 is not a beta blocker (adamw, 21:12:54)
* IDEA: create release criteria asserting some level of functionality
of livecd-tools (jlaska, 21:13:03)
* AGREED: move https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627789 to
f14blocker (poelcat, 21:15:00)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_13_Final_RC3_Install
(adamw, 21:19:50)
* AGREED: publishing a documented updates.img with a fix for 635887 is
an acceptable workaround, move 635887 to be a final blocker (adamw,
21:25:48)
* AGREED: 542255 is not a regression, is of minor impact, and the
question of non-default-spin bugs blocking releases requires further
discussion and clarification, so we will not block the beta for this
bug (adamw, 21:45:26)
* ACTION: there being no unresolved blocking issues or unmet release
criteria, Fedora 14 Beta is declared GOLD (poelcat, 21:55:34)
* open discussion (poelcat, 21:55:37)
Meeting ended at 21:58:31 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* there being no unresolved blocking issues or unmet release criteria,
Fedora 14 Beta is declared GOLD
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* there being no unresolved blocking issues or unmet release criteria,
Fedora 14 Beta is declared GOLD
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
_______________________________________________
test-announce mailing list
test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
09-22-2010, 10:51 PM
Dave Jones
Fedora 14 Beta Declared GOLD
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 03:31:39PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> At the Fedora 14 Beta Go/No-Go meeting today, the Fedora 14 Beta was
> declared GOLD and ready for release on September 28, 2010.
is what's at rsync://mirrors.kernel.org/mirrors/fedora/development/14/
right now the beta tree, or is that post-beta ?
I've been on vacation the last couple days, so out of the loop..
I did an install from the tree above this afternoon and hit this..
which would be kinda embarressing if that problem made it into beta, and the
fix is sitting in updates-testing. (I had to boot with enforcing=0
to update and get it working)
Dave
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
09-22-2010, 11:10 PM
Adam Williamson
Fedora 14 Beta Declared GOLD
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 18:51 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 03:31:39PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> > At the Fedora 14 Beta Go/No-Go meeting today, the Fedora 14 Beta was
> > declared GOLD and ready for release on September 28, 2010.
>
> is what's at rsync://mirrors.kernel.org/mirrors/fedora/development/14/
> right now the beta tree, or is that post-beta ?
> I've been on vacation the last couple days, so out of the loop..
>
> I did an install from the tree above this afternoon and hit this..
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636658
>
> which would be kinda embarressing if that problem made it into beta, and the
> fix is sitting in updates-testing. (I had to boot with enforcing=0
> to update and get it working)
what's there is actually probably pre-beta. I didn't hit anything like
this during any of the validation testing for beta, which involves
completing and testing numerous installs, and AFAIK no-one else doing
validation testing did either. so I think there's something odd about
the tree you installed from or the install you did. Not sure what,
though.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora 14 Beta Declared GOLD
