FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 06-29-2010, 01:39 PM
Jaroslav Skarvada
 
Default tcl/tk 8.5.8 update for F13?

Hi,

I would like to push tcl/tk 8.5.8 update to F13 testing (update from tcl/tk 8.5.7).

The purpose of this update is to resolve the: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560516
and probably more similar issues.

>From the repoquery only the tk seems to have exact version dependency on tcl. Also from my test with several packages requiring libtcl/libtk - they worked without rebuild. I don't like to break anything, thus please let me know if you see any problem with such update

regards

Jaroslav
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 06-29-2010, 02:12 PM
Michael Cronenworth
 
Default tcl/tk 8.5.8 update for F13?

Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
>> From the repoquery only the tk seems to have exact version dependency on tcl. Also from my test with several packages requiring libtcl/libtk - they worked without rebuild. I don't like to break anything, thus please let me know if you see any problem with such update

Are you sure?

Email from Kevin Fenzi[1]:
> Also, pidgin needed to be added to it. It failed rebuild due to a new
> tcl in the buildroot. This tcl build has been untagged now, so it's
> been rebuilt and should be added to the update soon.

[1] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-June/137983.html
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 06-29-2010, 02:27 PM
Jaroslav Skarvada
 
Default tcl/tk 8.5.8 update for F13?

AFAIK this shouldn't been related, please see:

https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3815

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Cronenworth" <mike@cchtml.com>
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 4:12:21 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna
Subject: Re: tcl/tk 8.5.8 update for F13?

Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
>> From the repoquery only the tk seems to have exact version dependency on tcl. Also from my test with several packages requiring libtcl/libtk - they worked without rebuild. I don't like to break anything, thus please let me know if you see any problem with such update

Are you sure?

Email from Kevin Fenzi[1]:
> Also, pidgin needed to be added to it. It failed rebuild due to a new
> tcl in the buildroot. This tcl build has been untagged now, so it's
> been rebuilt and should be added to the update soon.

[1] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-June/137983.html
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 06-30-2010, 12:05 AM
Kyle VanderBeek
 
Default tcl/tk 8.5.8 update for F13?

(Forgive me, I read the digest.* Cc me on replies if you want.)

I've added further comments to the releng thread:

https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3815


It looks to me like the core problem is the tcl Provides line that defines the tcl(abi) to be the exact same as the full version.* Given that the name of the lib is libtcl8.5, the ABI designator probably should include the the patch level (.7 or .8).


That would solve the death-grip between tcl and dependent packages.* But that's possibly something that needs to be done in rawhide (and tracked with a bug).

--
kylev@kylev.com

*Some people have a way with words, while others... erm... thingy.


--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 06-30-2010, 12:51 AM
Kyle VanderBeek
 
Default tcl/tk 8.5.8 update for F13?

On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Kyle VanderBeek <kylev@kylev.com> wrote:
> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3815
>
> It looks to me like the core problem is the tcl Provides line that defines the tcl(abi) to be the exact same as the full version.* Given that the name of the lib is libtcl8.5, the ABI designator probably should include the the patch level (.7 or .8).

Wow, I think I got that totally wrong. The ABI designator is correct,
but the Requires on tk is likely too restrictive:

Requires: tcl = %{epoch}:%{version}

That's what was causing my build to break. With the tcl override in
place and tk not built, that will happen every time. It'd be nice if
these were a little less tightly coupled.

--
kylev@kylev.com
*Some people have a way with words, while others... erm... thingy.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 10:31 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org