FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 06-03-2010, 02:33 PM
Xose Vazquez Perez
 
Default JBoss stalled (was status of some packages ??)

On 06/01/2010 05:09 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:

> On 05/29/2010 07:25 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>> JBoss[1] is still a *big* deficit. Potential for f14/15 ?
>
> I'm pretty sure JBoss is still a no-go because of poor licensing,
> specifically:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598

That is a nonsense.

JBoss is stalled because it depends on a package with:

- incompatible license
- six years old
- dead upstream

:-?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 06-03-2010, 02:38 PM
Pierre-Yves
 
Default JBoss stalled (was status of some packages ??)

On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 16:33 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>
> JBoss is stalled because it depends on a package with:
>
> - incompatible license
> - six years old
> - dead upstream
>
How is this different from what is on the bug report ?

Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 06-03-2010, 02:50 PM
"Tom "spot" Callaway"
 
Default JBoss stalled (was status of some packages ??)

On 06/03/2010 10:33 AM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> On 06/01/2010 05:09 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
>
>> On 05/29/2010 07:25 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>>> JBoss[1] is still a *big* deficit. Potential for f14/15 ?
>>
>> I'm pretty sure JBoss is still a no-go because of poor licensing,
>> specifically:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598
>
> That is a nonsense.
>
> JBoss is stalled because it depends on a package with:
>
> - incompatible license
> - six years old
> - dead upstream
>
> :-?

This is true (well, the problem is that there is no applicable and valid
license, not so much that it is incompatible), no matter how absurd it
might seem.

In general, Java licensing is... poor at best. This is admittedly a
rather confusing case, but still.

~spot
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 04:34 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org