FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 06-01-2010, 07:48 PM
Rahul Sundaram
 
Default Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

On 06/02/2010 01:08 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> +1. Nice idea. But I hope this is the first phase of auto QA development and we
> will see this integrated to Koji and other Fedora infrastructure in the
> future
>

It would also be useful to be able to filter out bogus rpmlint warnings
like missing buildroot definitions and so on which are obsolete. For
some cases atleast, rpmlint should be fixed instead but in other
instances, filtering out warnings so that I don't get mails on them
would be useful.

Rahul

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 06-02-2010, 01:40 AM
seth vidal
 
Default Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 18:29 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> seth vidal writes:
>
> >
> > I just added autoqa-optout to fedorapeople.
> >
> > it does what you expect it to do and acts just like autoqa-optin
>
> Would it be a good idea to mention these scripts somewhere in
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join?
>
>

perhaps - this is intended to be a temporary mechanism for opting in to
the results that autoqa currently has. The future is likely to be very
different.

-sv


--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 06-02-2010, 03:48 AM
Bruno Wolff III
 
Default Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 18:00:52 -0400,
seth vidal <skvidal@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> > Can I opt in for all packages I am the owner or all packagers I co-maintain
> > with one command?
>
> one command per pkg, yes.
>
> autoqa-optin pkgname devel F-14 F-13 F-12 EL-6 EL-5 EL-4

That answers my question.

If mail would have been just sent to me, I would have prefered to have been
able to optin for everything. But since it affects other people, I'll want to
be selective about which ones I turn on.

Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 06-02-2010, 04:12 AM
Peter Lemenkov
 
Default Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

2010/6/2 James Laska <jlaska@redhat.com>:
> Greetings package maintainers,
>
> Want to get notification of any breakage in your just-built koji
> packages?

It would be great if rpmlint logs will be automatically generated on
each koji build ans will be stored with oher koji build logs (in
separate file(s)). This greatly helps in package reviewing.



--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 06-02-2010, 07:38 AM
Jaroslav Reznik
 
Default Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

On Wednesday 02 June 2010 06:12:48 Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> 2010/6/2 James Laska <jlaska@redhat.com>:
> > Greetings package maintainers,
> >
> > Want to get notification of any breakage in your just-built koji
> > packages?
>
> It would be great if rpmlint logs will be automatically generated on
> each koji build ans will be stored with oher koji build logs (in
> separate file(s)). This greatly helps in package reviewing.

+1. Nice idea. But I hope this is the first phase of auto QA development and we
will see this integrated to Koji and other Fedora infrastructure in the
future.

Jaroslav
--
Jaroslav Řezn*k <jreznik@redhat.com>
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno

Office: +420 532 294 275
Mobile: +420 602 797 774
Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 06-02-2010, 07:40 AM
Stanislav Ochotnicky
 
Default Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

On 06/02/2010 12:11 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 16:43 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>> Greetings package maintainers,
>>
>> Want to get notification of any breakage in your just-built koji
>> packages? This includes results of rpmlint [1], rpmguard [2] and, if
>> applicable, initscript [3] tests. Good news, you can now opt-in to
>> receive test results by mail!
>>
>> All you have to do is:
>>
>> 1. Login to fedorapeople.org # ssh fedorapeople.org
>> 2. Run the command: autoqa-optin <package> [<release>]
>>
>> That's it! Thanks to Seth Vidal for the autoqa-optin script and
>> proposed changes to enable this feature.
>>
>
>
> I just added autoqa-optout to fedorapeople.
>
> it does what you expect it to do and acts just like autoqa-optin


When owner of package opts-in and I as co-maintainer opt-out, who will
get emails? Normally I would assume only owner and other co-maintainers
(sans me), but since you mentioned emails are sent to pkgowner
alias...Perhaps no one will get email? Please enlighten me.

As a side note, I welcome this...and will probably turn it on for most
of my packages. Thanks.


--
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@redhat.com>
Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno

PGP: 71A1677C
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 06-02-2010, 08:49 AM
Ralf Corsepius
 
Default Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

On 06/01/2010 10:43 PM, James Laska wrote:
> Greetings package maintainers,
>
> Want to get notification of any breakage in your just-built koji
> packages? This includes results of rpmlint [1],

Unless rpmlint starts to use a massively cleaned up set of rules, its
results are mostly noise.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 06-02-2010, 11:49 AM
James Laska
 
Default Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 10:49 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 06/01/2010 10:43 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > Greetings package maintainers,
> >
> > Want to get notification of any breakage in your just-built koji
> > packages? This includes results of rpmlint [1],
>
> Unless rpmlint starts to use a massively cleaned up set of rules, its
> results are mostly noise.

Which packages do you maintain where the output has become unmanageable?

Thanks,
James
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 06-02-2010, 12:10 PM
Ralf Corsepius
 
Default Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

On 06/02/2010 01:49 PM, James Laska wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 10:49 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 06/01/2010 10:43 PM, James Laska wrote:
>>> Greetings package maintainers,
>>>
>>> Want to get notification of any breakage in your just-built koji
>>> packages? This includes results of rpmlint [1],
>>
>> Unless rpmlint starts to use a massively cleaned up set of rules, its
>> results are mostly noise.
>
> Which packages do you maintain where the output has become unmanageable?

Noise is managable, but ...

* Just have a look at the output rpm produces on any arbitrary packages.
90% of the output it produces is just (silly) noise.

* Just have a look into most package reviews: Many of them suffer from
churn on the (silly) noise rpmlint produces.

That's why I consider rpmlint's current ruleset not to be suiteable for
automated QA.



--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 06-02-2010, 12:25 PM
Matthias Clasen
 
Default Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 07:49 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 10:49 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On 06/01/2010 10:43 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > > Greetings package maintainers,
> > >
> > > Want to get notification of any breakage in your just-built koji
> > > packages? This includes results of rpmlint [1],
> >
> > Unless rpmlint starts to use a massively cleaned up set of rules, its
> > results are mostly noise.
>
> Which packages do you maintain where the output has become unmanageable?

For myself, I really only think that the spell checks are intolerable.

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 09:59 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org