Michael Schwendt wrote:

On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:31:43 +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:


Michael Schwendt wrote:

On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:45:07 -0800, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:


Hi,

On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 09:37 -0500, KaiGai Kohei wrote:

Added Files:
postgresql-8.2.6.tar.gz
Log Message:

add postgresql-8.2.6.tar.gz

Why do you keep the tarball in CVS???

Regards,

That is highly annoying. I just run into it.

How can I find out who kaigai's sponsor is?
The FAS does not show that information.

Please fix sepostgresql in cvs ASAP. Upload large binary files to the
lookaside cache as everyone else.

OK, I'll fix it soon.
I'm sorry for the incorrect method to upgrade large binary file.

Could you point out a documentation url which describes processes to do?
I could not find it now...


http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/

Item 1 in the FAQ.

And yes, the Wiki is a confusing maze. :-(


Thanks for your suggestion.

I've fixed them with the above processes.
If possible, please confirm it.
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:08:43 +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:

> I've fixed them with the above processes.
> If possible, please confirm it.

Yes, the binaries are gone now. Good. You could also remove the
old patch files, which are no longer used in your package.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Michael Schwendt wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:08:43 +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:


I've fixed them with the above processes.
If possible, please confirm it.


Yes, the binaries are gone now. Good. You could also remove the
old patch files, which are no longer used in your package.


I also removed the lagacy patches applied for older base versions.

Thanks,
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, I'm planning to push postgresql 8.3 into rawhide very soon (actually
> it'll likely be 8.3RC2 at first, just to make sure it gets in there
> before F9 alpha freeze). Don't know what impact that will have on
> sepostgresql. If you won't be ready to update, it might be necessary
> to decouple the two packages after all.
>
> regards, tom lane

I've ported sepostgresql features into 8.3 based postgresql for a while.
See, http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/svn/ .
"/trunk" is already designed for 8.3RC1 based sepostgresql.
There will be an impact indeed, but it's not a negative one.

On the 8.3 based sepostgresql, it stores security attribute of HeapTuple
using the t_hoff padding area as you suggested at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522#c58

This is a reson why we cannot share any *.so libraries, as is.
However, I believe this change enables to share most of contrib packages
without any changing/rebuilding.

Thanks,
--
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list