On 05/01/2010 10:51 PM, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> kchmviewer
>
Hello, I am a new co-maintainer of this package. Though I am not the
owner of the 'devel' branch, I would take the responsibility and would
like to own all the epel branches.
Robin
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
05-01-2010, 07:47 PM
Christopher
my EPEL-6 packages up for takers
Hello...
On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 16:51 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I won't, at least for now, maintain the packages I maintain in EPEL-5 in
> EPEL-6. I have added a nobranch file in all of them. If you want to take up
> the package, you can. It is still unclear to me how to practically ensure
> that you become the EPEL-6 branch owner, instead of me, though. Hopefully
> this will be sorted out.
>
I'll try to take as many as I can. It happens that I will have lots of
free time over the next month or so. Most of the hard part has already
been done, so it should not be too hard except where is noted below.
I'm already testing EPEL builds on RHEL6 internally.
I'll sync with you off list tomorrow or Monday if that is OK with you
Patrice.
> If you want to maintain the EL-5 (or even EL-4) branch too, don't
> hesitate, the less package I maintain the better I am.
>
maybe.
> I think that wdm should not be maintained in EL-6 anyway, since upstream
> is dead and there is no ConsoleKit integration.
>
> For the dap-* packages it maybe worth waiting for a stabilisation of
> the ABI, and maybe integration with bes and packaging of olfs to have a
> working hyrax server before branching. My guess is that there are no
> users of these packages anyway. Also maybe the opendap implementantion
> in netcdf itself could be used instead of libdap/libnc-dap.
>
> The list is:
> acpitool
> asa
> bibexport
> BibTool
> bitmap
> boolstuff
> cernlib
> cernlib-g77
> cppunit
> dap-freeform_handler
> dap-hdf4_handler
> dap-netcdf_handler
> dap-server
> docbook2X
> elektra
> esmtp
> flasm
> g2clib
> gnochm
> gpicview
> grads
> halevt
> html2ps
> kchmviewer
> libdap
> libdockapp
> libesmtp
> libnc-dap
> libsx
> ooo2txt
> pam_ssh
> perl-Algorithm-CurveFit
> perl-Cache
> perl-Feed-Find
> perl-File-BaseDir
> perl-File-DesktopEntry
> perl-File-MimeInfo
> perl-File-NFSLock
> perl-Heap
> perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks
> perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse
> perl-Math-MatrixReal
> perl-Math-Symbolic
> perl-Module-Signature
> perl-Parse-Yapp
> perl-Statistics-Descriptive
> perl-Test-Distribution
> perl-Text-CHM
> perl-Text-Unidecode
> pmount
> ps2eps
> python-chm
> tetex-elsevier
> tetex-tex4ht
> uread
> wdm
> wmacpi
> wmix
> xbae
> xchm
> xdialog
>
>
--
Christopher McCrory
"The guy that keeps the servers running"
Let's face it, there's no Hollow Earth, no robots, and
no 'mute rays.' And even if there were, waxed paper is
no defense. I tried it. Only tinfoil works.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
05-01-2010, 07:47 PM
Christopher
my EPEL-6 packages up for takers
Hello...
On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 16:51 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I won't, at least for now, maintain the packages I maintain in EPEL-5 in
> EPEL-6. I have added a nobranch file in all of them. If you want to take up
> the package, you can. It is still unclear to me how to practically ensure
> that you become the EPEL-6 branch owner, instead of me, though. Hopefully
> this will be sorted out.
>
I'll try to take as many as I can. It happens that I will have lots of
free time over the next month or so. Most of the hard part has already
been done, so it should not be too hard except where is noted below.
I'm already testing EPEL builds on RHEL6 internally.
I'll sync with you off list tomorrow or Monday if that is OK with you
Patrice.
> If you want to maintain the EL-5 (or even EL-4) branch too, don't
> hesitate, the less package I maintain the better I am.
>
maybe.
> I think that wdm should not be maintained in EL-6 anyway, since upstream
> is dead and there is no ConsoleKit integration.
>
> For the dap-* packages it maybe worth waiting for a stabilisation of
> the ABI, and maybe integration with bes and packaging of olfs to have a
> working hyrax server before branching. My guess is that there are no
> users of these packages anyway. Also maybe the opendap implementantion
> in netcdf itself could be used instead of libdap/libnc-dap.
>
> The list is:
> acpitool
> asa
> bibexport
> BibTool
> bitmap
> boolstuff
> cernlib
> cernlib-g77
> cppunit
> dap-freeform_handler
> dap-hdf4_handler
> dap-netcdf_handler
> dap-server
> docbook2X
> elektra
> esmtp
> flasm
> g2clib
> gnochm
> gpicview
> grads
> halevt
> html2ps
> kchmviewer
> libdap
> libdockapp
> libesmtp
> libnc-dap
> libsx
> ooo2txt
> pam_ssh
> perl-Algorithm-CurveFit
> perl-Cache
> perl-Feed-Find
> perl-File-BaseDir
> perl-File-DesktopEntry
> perl-File-MimeInfo
> perl-File-NFSLock
> perl-Heap
> perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks
> perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse
> perl-Math-MatrixReal
> perl-Math-Symbolic
> perl-Module-Signature
> perl-Parse-Yapp
> perl-Statistics-Descriptive
> perl-Test-Distribution
> perl-Text-CHM
> perl-Text-Unidecode
> pmount
> ps2eps
> python-chm
> tetex-elsevier
> tetex-tex4ht
> uread
> wdm
> wmacpi
> wmix
> xbae
> xchm
> xdialog
>
>
--
Christopher McCrory
"The guy that keeps the servers running"
Let's face it, there's no Hollow Earth, no robots, and
no 'mute rays.' And even if there were, waxed paper is
no defense. I tried it. Only tinfoil works.
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
05-02-2010, 10:04 AM
Paul Howarth
my EPEL-6 packages up for takers
On Sat, 1 May 2010 16:51:25 +0200
Patrice Dumas <pertusus@free.fr> wrote:
> perl-Module-Signature
I'll take that one.
Cheers, Paul.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
05-02-2010, 10:04 AM
Paul Howarth
my EPEL-6 packages up for takers
On Sat, 1 May 2010 16:51:25 +0200
Patrice Dumas <pertusus@free.fr> wrote:
> perl-Module-Signature
I'll take that one.
Cheers, Paul.
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
05-02-2010, 11:08 AM
Patrice Dumas
my EPEL-6 packages up for takers
On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 11:04:13AM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Sat, 1 May 2010 16:51:25 +0200
> Patrice Dumas <pertusus@free.fr> wrote:
>
> > perl-Module-Signature
Only EL-6 or also EL-5 and EL-4?
--
Pat
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
05-03-2010, 10:56 AM
Paul Howarth
my EPEL-6 packages up for takers
On Sun, 2 May 2010 13:08:10 +0200
Patrice Dumas <pertusus@free.fr> wrote:
> On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 11:04:13AM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > On Sat, 1 May 2010 16:51:25 +0200
> > Patrice Dumas <pertusus@free.fr> wrote:
> >
> > > perl-Module-Signature
>
> Only EL-6 or also EL-5 and EL-4?
I'll take all of them.
Cheers, Paul.
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
05-03-2010, 03:37 PM
Orion Poplawski
my EPEL-6 packages up for takers
On 05/01/2010 08:51 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote:
Hello,
I won't, at least for now, maintain the packages I maintain in EPEL-5 in
EPEL-6. I have added a nobranch file in all of them. If you want to take up
the package, you can. It is still unclear to me how to practically ensure
that you become the EPEL-6 branch owner, instead of me, though. Hopefully
this will be sorted out.
If you want to maintain the EL-5 (or even EL-4) branch too, don't
hesitate, the less package I maintain the better I am.
g2clib
I'll take all releases of g2clib
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion@cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
07-01-2010, 11:30 AM
Marc Bradshaw
my EPEL-6 packages up for takers
Hi Patrice,
One of my packages has a dependency on docbook2X, so I will take that one.
Thanks,
On 2 May 2010 00:51, Patrice Dumas <pertusus@free.fr> wrote:
Hello,
I won't, at least for now, maintain the packages I maintain in EPEL-5 in
EPEL-6. I have added a nobranch file in all of them. If you want to take up
the package, you can. It is still unclear to me how to practically ensure
that you become the EPEL-6 branch owner, instead of me, though. Hopefully
this will be sorted out.
If you want to maintain the EL-5 (or even EL-4) branch too, don't
hesitate, the less package I maintain the better I am.
I think that wdm should not be maintained in EL-6 anyway, since upstream
is dead and there is no ConsoleKit integration.
For the dap-* packages it maybe worth waiting for a stabilisation of
the ABI, and maybe integration with bes and packaging of olfs to have a
working hyrax server before branching. My guess is that there are no
users of these packages anyway. Also maybe the opendap implementantion
in netcdf itself could be used instead of libdap/libnc-dap.
my EPEL-6 packages up for takers
