On 04/29/2010 09:24 AM, Adam Miller wrote:
> By that logic we shouldn't have a development group at all since developers
> know what they need.
I sense a misunderstanding.
Yes, IMO, any "default" (preselection) of "a devel group of packages"
hardly makes sense. However, marking packages as members of an optional
"devel group of packages" surely makes sense.
Or differently: One person's most valuable devel-tool is another
person's packaging bloat
> -AdamM (from Android )
> On Apr 29, 2010 2:07 AM, "Ralf Corsepius"<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 04/28/2010 09:41 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>> Rex Dieter (email@example.com...
> Make both optional.
> Devs should know what they need, so there should not be any need to make
> any of them default.
devel mailing list