On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com> wrote:
> That seems strange, it should use dracut, not mkinitrd at all? Is this
> an F13 system?

dracut package provides /sbin/mkinitrd

and you'll see that new-kernel-pkg gets called with --mkinitrd as well
as --dracut in the kernel scriptlet for both referenced kernel builds.

I don't think anything has changed in the scriptlet logic there
between the kernel releases so it makes the scriptlet failure that
much more of a head scratcher.

-jef
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 14:53:04 -0700,
Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi, everyone. We're looking at pulling kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 into
> Fedora 13 Beta, quite late, because current Beta candidate builds
> include kernel-2.6.33.1-19.fc13 which is known to include a severe bug
> that breaks boot on systems with Broadcom wired ethernet adapters
> supported by the b44 module.

I have been testing most of the f13 builds as they become available in
koji and haven't noticed any regressions. There was once case where
a couple of updates came in close succession and I updated before trying
out one of the kernels. I am not sure if that was -24 or not.
I am currently running 2.6.33.2-35 on 4 machines and haven't noticed any
regressions. That's not the same, but gives an indication that some of
the patches aren't causing problems.

> However, -24 has other changes from -19, including to the nouveau
> (NVIDIA graphics) and iwlwifi (Intel wifi) drivers. We really need as
> many people as possible to test kernel -24, which you can get at
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=164598 , and
> confirm that it works okay on your systems.

I have one machine that has an nv28 card in it and an attached monitor.
I haven't noticed a problem caused by the nouveau driver, but haven't
done much at the console on that machine this week.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reporting success, kernel -19 booted on this machine, and the new one does as well. nvidia and cpu info below
# lspci | grep VGA01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G86 [GeForce 8400M GS] (rev a1)

cpu family * * *: 6model * * * * * : 23model name * * *: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU * * T9300 *@ 2.50GHz
Regards
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:11 AM, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com> wrote:


> That seems strange, it should use dracut, not mkinitrd at all? Is this

> an F13 system?



dracut package provides /sbin/mkinitrd



and you'll see that new-kernel-pkg gets called with --mkinitrd as well

as --dracut in the kernel scriptlet for both referenced kernel builds.



I don't think anything has changed in the scriptlet logic there

between the kernel releases so it makes the scriptlet failure that

much more of a head scratcher.



-jef

--

devel mailing list

devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

On 04/06/2010 04:11 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> dracut package provides /sbin/mkinitrd
>
> and you'll see that new-kernel-pkg gets called with --mkinitrd as well
> as --dracut in the kernel scriptlet for both referenced kernel builds.
>
> I don't think anything has changed in the scriptlet logic there
> between the kernel releases so it makes the scriptlet failure that
> much more of a head scratcher.

# rpm -qf /sbin/new-kernel-pkg
grubby-7.0.13-1.fc13.x86_64
# rpm --verify grubby-7.0.13-1.fc13.x86_64
prelink: /sbin/grubby: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking
S.?...... /sbin/grubby
# ldd /sbin/grubby
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff8c5ff000)
libblkid.so.1 => /lib64/libblkid.so.1 (0x00000038b4e00000)
libpopt.so.0 => /lib64/libpopt.so.0 (0x00000036a9000000)
libglib-2.0.so.0 => /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0x0000003446e00000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f550e125000)
libuuid.so.1 => /lib64/libuuid.so.1 (0x00000038b5200000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f550e4aa000)
# rpm -qf /lib64/libc.so.6 /lib64/libblkid.so.1 /lib64/libpopt.so.0 /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 /lib64/libuuid.so.1
glibc-2.11.90-17.x86_64
libblkid-2.17.2-1.fc13.x86_64
popt-1.13-7.fc13.x86_64
glib2-2.24.0-1.fc13.x86_64
libuuid-2.17.2-1.fc13.x86_64
# rpm --verify glibc-2.11.90-17.x86_64 libblkid-2.17.2-1.fc13.x86_64 popt-1.13-7.fc13.x86_64 glib2-2.24.0-1.fc13.x86_64 libuuid-2.17.2-1.fc13.x86_64
prelink: /lib64/libblkid.so.1.1.0: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking
S.?...... /lib64/libblkid.so.1.1.0
prelink: /lib64/libpopt.so.0.0.0: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking
S.?...... /lib64/libpopt.so.0.0.0
prelink: /lib64/libgio-2.0.so.0.2400.0: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking
S.?...... /lib64/libgio-2.0.so.0.2400.0
prelink: /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.0: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking
S.?...... /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.0
prelink: /lib64/libgmodule-2.0.so.0.2400.0: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking
S.?...... /lib64/libgmodule-2.0.so.0.2400.0
prelink: /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0.2400.0: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking
S.?...... /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0.2400.0
prelink: /lib64/libgthread-2.0.so.0.2400.0: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking
S.?...... /lib64/libgthread-2.0.so.0.2400.0
prelink: /usr/bin/gio-querymodules-32: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking
S.?...... /usr/bin/gio-querymodules-32
prelink: /lib64/libuuid.so.1.3.0: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking
S.?...... /lib64/libuuid.so.1.3.0
#

--
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi, everyone. We're looking at pulling kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 into
> Fedora 13 Beta, quite late, because current Beta candidate builds
> include kernel-2.6.33.1-19.fc13 which is known to include a severe bug
> that breaks boot on systems with Broadcom wired ethernet adapters
> supported by the b44 module.
>
> However, -24 has other changes from -19, including to the nouveau
> (NVIDIA graphics) and iwlwifi (Intel wifi) drivers. We really need as
> many people as possible to test kernel -24, which you can get at
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=164598 , and
> confirm that it works okay on your systems.
>
> To install it, use 'rpm -ivh' for the kernel and -devel packages. If you
> have kernel-headers installed, 'rpm -Uvh' that first. Then reboot to the
> kernel and check that it boots up okay. Please reply to this thread with
> your results. Thanks!
> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
> http://www.happyassassin.net
>

Works fine on my X60 with:

03:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 3945ABG
[Golan] Network Connection (rev 02)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

On 06-04-2010 18:53, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, everyone. We're looking at pulling kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 into
> Fedora 13 Beta, quite late, because current Beta candidate builds
> include kernel-2.6.33.1-19.fc13 which is known to include a severe bug
> that breaks boot on systems with Broadcom wired ethernet adapters
> supported by the b44 module.
>
> However, -24 has other changes from -19, including to the nouveau
> (NVIDIA graphics) and iwlwifi (Intel wifi) drivers. We really need as
> many people as possible to test kernel -24, which you can get at
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=164598 , and
> confirm that it works okay on your systems.
>
> To install it, use 'rpm -ivh' for the kernel and -devel packages. If you
> have kernel-headers installed, 'rpm -Uvh' that first. Then reboot to the
> kernel and check that it boots up okay. Please reply to this thread with
> your results. Thanks!

Works for me on HP Pavilion dv7 1025nr

01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G96 [GeForce 9600M GT] (rev a1)
02:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 5100 AGN [Shiloh] Network Connection

/proc/cpuinfo
cpu family : 6
model : 23
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P8400 @ 2.26GH

--
Filipe Rosset
Fedora Project Brazil
filiperosset@fedoraproject.com
rosset.filipe@gmail.com
Rio Grande do Sul - Brazil

"First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win." Mahatma Gandhi
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

On 04/06/2010 11:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:

Hi, everyone. We're looking at pulling kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 into
Fedora 13 Beta, quite late, because current Beta candidate builds
include kernel-2.6.33.1-19.fc13 which is known to include a severe bug
that breaks boot on systems with Broadcom wired ethernet adapters
supported by the b44 module.

However, -24 has other changes from -19, including to the nouveau
(NVIDIA graphics) and iwlwifi (Intel wifi) drivers. We really need as
many people as possible to test kernel -24, which you can get at
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=164598 , and
confirm that it works okay on your systems.

To install it, use 'rpm -ivh' for the kernel and -devel packages. If you
have kernel-headers installed, 'rpm -Uvh' that first. Then reboot to the
kernel and check that it boots up okay. Please reply to this thread with
your results. Thanks!


Hi Adam,

no problems until now after installing kernel, kernel-devel,
kernel-headers and rebooting.

Hardware:

00:00.0 Host bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 IGP2 (rev c1)
00:00.1 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 1 (rev c1)
00:00.2 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 4 (rev c1)
00:00.3 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 3 (rev c1)
00:00.4 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 2 (rev c1)
00:00.5 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 5 (rev c1)
00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 ISA Bridge (rev a4)
00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation nForce2 SMBus (MCP) (rev a2)
00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4)
00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4)
00:02.2 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4)
00:04.0 Ethernet controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Ethernet
Controller (rev a1)

00:08.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 External PCI Bridge (rev a3)
00:09.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation nForce2 IDE (rev a2)
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 AGP (rev c1)
01:09.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Live! EMU10k1 (rev 0a)
01:09.1 Input device controller: Creative Labs SB Live! Game Port (rev 0a)
02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV34 [GeForce FX
5200] (rev a1)


CPU:

processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 6
model : 10
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3000+
stepping : 0
cpu MHz : 2162.562
cache size : 512 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat
pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow up

bogomips : 4325.12
clflush size : 32
cache_alignment : 32
address sizes : 34 bits physical, 32 bits virtual
power management: ts

Regards

Joachim Backes <joachim.backes@rhrk.uni-kl.de>

http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:45:39 -0700 John Reiser wrote:
> Then I did "rpm --erase" of -24 and "rpm --install" of -24, and the
> message was: -----
> /sbin/new-kernel-pkg: line 289: 2334 Segmentation fault (core
> dumped)

Is it reproducible if you run dracut by hand?:
dracut -f -v /boot/initramfs-2.6.33.1-24.fc13.x86_64.img
2.6.33.1-24.fc13.x86_64

Did abrt catch the segfault? If yes, did you post the report to
Bugzilla?

Michal
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

On 06/04/10 23:22, Adam Williamson wrote:

Works fine on Dell Vostro 200 as factory minus included soft.

Kernel.x86_64
System i686

Architecture: x86_64
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
CPU(s): 1
Thread(s) per core: 1
Core(s) per socket: 1
CPU socket(s): 1
NUMA node(s): 1
Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
CPU family: 6
Model: 22
Stepping: 1
CPU MHz: 1600.000
L1d cache: 32K
L1i cache: 32K
L2 cache: 512K


00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82G33/G31 Express
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02)


--
Regards,

Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora.x86 64-32 Hybrid
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Hi,

kernel-2.6.33.1-19.fc13 works for me (amd64 system with nvidia chipset).

Regards,

Hans


On 04/06/2010 11:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, everyone. We're looking at pulling kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 into
> Fedora 13 Beta, quite late, because current Beta candidate builds
> include kernel-2.6.33.1-19.fc13 which is known to include a severe bug
> that breaks boot on systems with Broadcom wired ethernet adapters
> supported by the b44 module.
>
> However, -24 has other changes from -19, including to the nouveau
> (NVIDIA graphics) and iwlwifi (Intel wifi) drivers. We really need as
> many people as possible to test kernel -24, which you can get at
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=164598 , and
> confirm that it works okay on your systems.
>
> To install it, use 'rpm -ivh' for the kernel and -devel packages. If you
> have kernel-headers installed, 'rpm -Uvh' that first. Then reboot to the
> kernel and check that it boots up okay. Please reply to this thread with
> your results. Thanks!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel