CLA problems (was: Install fedora-easy-karma by default?)
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:20:11AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 03/11/2010 02:14 AM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > > > > Can you leave bodhi feedback with an FAS account if you haven't signed a > > CLA? (The thing about FAS accounts I am not crazy about is the CLA. What > > about using a bugzilla account instead?) > > > > What is the problem you have with the CLA? Imho it is to complex, which scares potential contributor away. Especially if only a comment and a karma value are required, the CLA is way to complex to require it. Regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel |
CLA problems (was: Install fedora-easy-karma by default?)
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Till Maas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:20:11AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > On 03/11/2010 02:14 AM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > > > > > > Can you leave bodhi feedback with an FAS account if you haven't signed a > > > CLA? (The thing about FAS accounts I am not crazy about is the CLA. What > > > about using a bugzilla account instead?) > > > > > > > What is the problem you have with the CLA? > > Imho it is to complex, which scares potential contributor away. > Especially if only a comment and a karma value are required, the CLA is > way to complex to require it. > We don't require it though I thought? Can somone who has not signed the CLA confirm? -Mike -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 08:49 PM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.