FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 03-10-2010, 12:26 AM
David Lehman
 
Default Various fixes to handling of preexisting devices

On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 18:18 -0600, David Lehman wrote:
> All of these should end up on f13-branch as well, although only patches
> 1-3 fix a blocker as of now. Patch 4 addresses a bug that came up while
> testing patches 1-3. Patch 5 is just in the same area, so I threw it in
> for good measure.

Actually, as much as I'd like to cram in the whole set as a blocker fix,
it's really only the first two that are needed to fix #565848. Bah.

>
> Hans, 1-3 is the alternative I came up with for the deepcopy of the
> original device stack in ActionDestroyFormat.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list


_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
 
Old 03-10-2010, 07:39 AM
Hans de Goede
 
Default Various fixes to handling of preexisting devices

Hi,

On 03/10/2010 02:26 AM, David Lehman wrote:

On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 18:18 -0600, David Lehman wrote:

All of these should end up on f13-branch as well, although only patches
1-3 fix a blocker as of now. Patch 4 addresses a bug that came up while
testing patches 1-3. Patch 5 is just in the same area, so I threw it in
for good measure.


Actually, as much as I'd like to cram in the whole set as a blocker fix,
it's really only the first two that are needed to fix #565848. Bah.



Ugh, although I'm fine with the new branching policy I think we are
freezing way to hard and way too early here. I think we should not go
in beta blockers only mode until F-13 actually hits the beta freeze.

We've just released the alpha, its not like the beta is even (very)
close, let alone the RC's.

Patch 3 fixes a long standing bug (probably more), I'm pretty sure
it at least fixes bug 527444.

Patch 4 seems perfectly safe, so why not include it, as were not in
beta freeze yet

Patch 5 idem.



Hans, 1-3 is the alternative I came up with for the deepcopy of the
original device stack in ActionDestroyFormat.


Ack, I like, thanks!

Regards,

Hans

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
 
Old 03-10-2010, 03:51 PM
David Lehman
 
Default Various fixes to handling of preexisting devices

On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 09:39 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/10/2010 02:26 AM, David Lehman wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 18:18 -0600, David Lehman wrote:
> >> All of these should end up on f13-branch as well, although only patches
> >> 1-3 fix a blocker as of now. Patch 4 addresses a bug that came up while
> >> testing patches 1-3. Patch 5 is just in the same area, so I threw it in
> >> for good measure.
> >
> > Actually, as much as I'd like to cram in the whole set as a blocker fix,
> > it's really only the first two that are needed to fix #565848. Bah.
> >
>
> Ugh, although I'm fine with the new branching policy I think we are
> freezing way to hard and way too early here. I think we should not go
> in beta blockers only mode until F-13 actually hits the beta freeze.

It is a bit painful, I agree, but the way we've done this in the past
has been problematic and needs some adjustment. I'm trying to find some
ground in between blockers-only and wide-open for perhaps now until two
days before the beta test compose, but I haven't settled on anything
yet.

>
> We've just released the alpha, its not like the beta is even (very)
> close, let alone the RC's.

It's pretty close if you ask releng or QA. A week from today is a beta
test compose. A week after that is the first beta candidate compose.

>
> Patch 3 fixes a long standing bug (probably more), I'm pretty sure
> it at least fixes bug 527444.

Agreed -- it's definitely something that should be fixed.

>
> Patch 4 seems perfectly safe, so why not include it, as were not in
> beta freeze yet
>
> Patch 5 idem.
>
> >>
> >> Hans, 1-3 is the alternative I came up with for the deepcopy of the
> >> original device stack in ActionDestroyFormat.
>
> Ack, I like, thanks!

Glad to hear it.

Dave

>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
> _______________________________________________
> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list


_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 09:46 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org