FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.

» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development

LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-08-2010, 10:20 AM
Richard Hughes
Default sos update causing PackageKit to barf

On 8 March 2010 10:59, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@gmail.com> wrote:
> That means you don't have the key installed:

This is a fresh F13 pre-alpha spin, updated last a few days ago.

> $ rpm -Kv sos-1.9-1.fc12.noarch.rpm
> sos-1.9-1.fc12.noarch.rpm:
> * *Header V3 RSA/SHA256 signature: OK, key ID 57bbccba
> * *Header SHA1 digest: OK (db9c3b4d1c5a5990e1c4b72cbb4c76d7c65a25e9)
> * *V3 RSA/SHA256 signature: OK, key ID 57bbccba
> * *MD5 digest: OK (85ddf4a6d8615965a79f06e7f09be84c)
> $ rpm -q gpg-pubkey-57bbccba
> gpg-pubkey-57bbccba-4a6f97af
> It is signed.

Sure, but doesn't 57BBCCBA indicate that it's a F12 signed package,
not a F13 signed package? I don't appear to have the 4a6f97af
signature installed by default on my fresh F13 (not upgraded from F12)

devel mailing list
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel2���5�4�5�����z{h��. Ǭq���I�)z��ib�����7�� ��x���m5��׍>�4E��&���q ���������=o+6��ڶ*l��0 ��ki���&#x1E5897;����z{h� .�Ǭq���'u6���M4���{�j�! �(�O j���v���z+���ǧ��(� �]z�,��5۽4ռ�j)z{h���-~,p��H�������4�����)ڕ :z{h�ǧ��(�ޖ+*�ǧ��z{h��� ��&����׿`��%y�����׿ `��%y�������q�����a# >'w��{�+q������ � j���:�9ӝ4$�Ǣ�� ��"��L�ێ���{h�ǧ��(�( O j���7�9�4=$��z�"�}tE��t� �+aH��ֺ��;׽v��N;�6�(�O j���7�8�4=$ȝ��$��㞶�4�� ��E���߿w�t�t�8�4���{�5 ׾��7ӝx�5����׷s�x{�t�9ӽ5� W[oG<����w}]󩚊X&j)�mz��m5���jf�u�

Thread Tools

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:43 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org