FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 12-30-2009, 02:25 AM
Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
 
Default Can some provenpackager bump openvpn in EL-5

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,
I have this bz open for some time now, with no response.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544944

Can some one with proven packager access bump the EL-5 version to the
latest one in devel.

Thanks.

- --
Regards,
Huzaifa Sidhpurwala, RHCE, CCNA (IRC: huzaifas)


GnuPG Fingerprint:
3A0F DAFB 9279 02ED 273B FFE9 CC70 DCF2 DA5B DAE5
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Red Hat - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iD8DBQFLOsgRzHDc8tpb2uURAj7nAJ9IsE1qHV+TzaG0S+Mz3D gAimhkoACgjN/y
5SKpIFhDa4YB9JEFW1ERZz8=
=PCW0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 12-30-2009, 09:52 AM
Jussi Lehtola
 
Default Can some provenpackager bump openvpn in EL-5

On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 08:55 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
> Hi,
> I have this bz open for some time now, with no response.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544944
>
> Can some one with proven packager access bump the EL-5 version to the
> latest one in devel.

Even though any proven packager could do the change, that bug does not
fall in the items listed in the proven packager policy [1]. You haven't
listed any problems with the current package, you're just requesting a
version upgrade.

Version upgrades should be performed by the package maintainer. This
especially holds in EPEL, which should be a slowly moving distribution.

[1]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Who_is_allowed_to_modify_which_packages
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussilehtola@fedoraproject.org

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 12-30-2009, 10:05 AM
Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
 
Default Can some provenpackager bump openvpn in EL-5

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 08:55 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have this bz open for some time now, with no response.
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544944
>>
>> Can some one with proven packager access bump the EL-5 version to the
>> latest one in devel.
>
> Even though any proven packager could do the change, that bug does not
> fall in the items listed in the proven packager policy [1]. You haven't
> listed any problems with the current package, you're just requesting a
> version upgrade.
>
The version of openvpn in EPEL is an upstream rc version.
The Changelog file upstream shows a lot of bugs have been fixed and it
would be nice to have it fixed in EPEL too.

> Version upgrades should be performed by the package maintainer. This
> especially holds in EPEL, which should be a slowly moving distribution.
>
In this case the bz is around 2.5 weeks old, with absolutely no response.
What is the policy to get the package updated in this case?
> [1]
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Who_is_allowed_to_modify_which_packages


- --
Regards,
Huzaifa Sidhpurwala, RHCE, CCNA (IRC: huzaifas)

GnuPG Fingerprint:
3A0F DAFB 9279 02ED 273B FFE9 CC70 DCF2 DA5B DAE5
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Red Hat - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iD8DBQFLOzPgzHDc8tpb2uURAkRbAJ9fEMK2uOwbaeoDPb0f5F WPAt0NzACfX5Ue
BtBtFPMo3x2Pe9SPdWZTLVM=
=w3lz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 12-30-2009, 11:11 AM
Jussi Lehtola
 
Default Can some provenpackager bump openvpn in EL-5

On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 16:35 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
> Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > Even though any proven packager could do the change, that bug does not
> > fall in the items listed in the proven packager policy [1]. You haven't
> > listed any problems with the current package, you're just requesting a
> > version upgrade.
> >
> The version of openvpn in EPEL is an upstream rc version.
> The Changelog file upstream shows a lot of bugs have been fixed and it
> would be nice to have it fixed in EPEL too.

OK, that's starting to sound better.

> > Version upgrades should be performed by the package maintainer. This
> > especially holds in EPEL, which should be a slowly moving distribution.
> >
> In this case the bz is around 2.5 weeks old, with absolutely no response.
> What is the policy to get the package updated in this case?

See the nonresponsive maintainer policy at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussilehtola@fedoraproject.org

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 01-04-2010, 12:49 PM
Jon Ciesla
 
Default Can some provenpackager bump openvpn in EL-5

Jussi Lehtola wrote:

On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 16:35 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:


Jussi Lehtola wrote:


Even though any proven packager could do the change, that bug does not
fall in the items listed in the proven packager policy [1]. You haven't
listed any problems with the current package, you're just requesting a
version upgrade.



The version of openvpn in EPEL is an upstream rc version.
The Changelog file upstream shows a lot of bugs have been fixed and it
would be nice to have it fixed in EPEL too.



OK, that's starting to sound better.



Version upgrades should be performed by the package maintainer. This
especially holds in EPEL, which should be a slowly moving distribution.



In this case the bz is around 2.5 weeks old, with absolutely no response.
What is the policy to get the package updated in this case?



See the nonresponsive maintainer policy at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers

Actually, FYI, I'm a provenpackager and have recently contacted the
openvpn maintainer. There are quite a few open bugs, including yours,
and I requested his approval to take a look at the open bugs and make
changes, updates, etc, and he gave me the green light. I'll try to get
to this this week.


Essentially, he's not been doing much with Fedora lately due to Real
Life intervening, which I can certainly understand.


-J

--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 01-05-2010, 02:30 PM
Jon Ciesla
 
Default Can some provenpackager bump openvpn in EL-5

Jon Ciesla wrote:

Jussi Lehtola wrote:

On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 16:35 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:


Jussi Lehtola wrote:


Even though any proven packager could do the change, that bug does not
fall in the items listed in the proven packager policy [1]. You
haven't

listed any problems with the current package, you're just requesting a
version upgrade.



The version of openvpn in EPEL is an upstream rc version.
The Changelog file upstream shows a lot of bugs have been fixed and it
would be nice to have it fixed in EPEL too.



OK, that's starting to sound better.



Version upgrades should be performed by the package maintainer. This
especially holds in EPEL, which should be a slowly moving
distribution.



In this case the bz is around 2.5 weeks old, with absolutely no
response.

What is the policy to get the package updated in this case?



See the nonresponsive maintainer policy at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers


Actually, FYI, I'm a provenpackager and have recently contacted the
openvpn maintainer. There are quite a few open bugs, including yours,
and I requested his approval to take a look at the open bugs and make
changes, updates, etc, and he gave me the green light. I'll try to
get to this this week.


Essentially, he's not been doing much with Fedora lately due to Real
Life intervening, which I can certainly understand.


-J

An update for F-12 is on it's way to testing. I'm using it now with no
issues, but I can't test the boot bug, as the machine acting as my
openvpn server isn't using NetworkManager. That said, it should work.
Please test and let me know if changes need to be made.


-J

--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 01:52 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org