FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 01-05-2008, 06:56 PM
Caolan McNamara
 
Default rawhide report: bacula/kannel -> mktexlsr ?

On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 07:24 -0500, Build System wrote:
> Broken deps for i386
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> bacula-* - 2.0.3-11.fc8.i386 requires libssl.so.6
> kannel - 1.4.1-5.i386 requires libssl.so.6

So, what exactly is the current problem with these two ? Is it just the
mysterious failure of TeX to execute some stuff, i.e.

"
latex -interaction=batchmode bacula.tex
This is pdfTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (Web2C 7.5.6)
%&-line parsing enabled.
entering extended mode
make[1]: *** [tex] Error 1
"

and...

"
cd `dirname doc/alligata/alligata.xml` && jadetex `basename doc/alligata/alligata`.tex >/dev/null ||
( echo Check `dirname doc/alligata/alligata.xml`/`basename doc/alligata/alligata`.log for errors && false)
kpathsea: Running mktexfmt jadetex.fmt
Check doc/alligata/alligata.log for errors
make: *** [doc/alligata/alligata.ps] Error 1
"

If so then I see (from a quick google) that locally running "mktexlsr"
before trying to build them was sufficient to give me two successful
builds. I can't add that to the affected .specs themselves so I suspect
that some TeX package in the dependency chain should effectively run
mktexlsr as root during install. Or something of that nature, I'm
vague on the TeX world.

C.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 01-05-2008, 09:24 PM
Jason L Tibbitts III
 
Default rawhide report: bacula/kannel -> mktexlsr ?

>>>>> "CM" == Caolan McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com> writes:

CM> So, what exactly is the current problem with these two ? Is it
CM> just the mysterious failure of TeX to execute some stuff, i.e.

Yes, I debugged this the other day. The problem for bacula is that
latex2html somehow does not properly run texhash in %post, so nothing
can find html.sty. If you force a texhash it works. Changing the
post scriptlet for latex2html to not use "/usr/bin/env -
/usr/bin/texhash" but to just call texhash directly works. I don't
know why.

CM> " latex -interaction=batchmode bacula.tex

Remove -interaction=batchmode to see errors from latex.

- J<

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 01-05-2008, 10:24 PM
Alex Lancaster
 
Default rawhide report: bacula/kannel -> mktexlsr ?

>>>>> "CM" == Caolan McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com> writes:

CM> So, what exactly is the current problem with these two ? Is it
CM> just the mysterious failure of TeX to execute some stuff, i.e.

>>>>> "JT" == Jason L Tibbitts writes:

JT> Yes, I debugged this the other day. The problem for bacula is
JT> that latex2html somehow does not properly run texhash in %post,
JT> so nothing can find html.sty. If you force a texhash it works.
JT> Changing the post scriptlet for latex2html to not use
JT> "/usr/bin/env - /usr/bin/texhash" but to just call texhash
JT> directly works. I don't know why.

JT> Remove -interaction=batchmode to see errors from latex.

In the bacula case here is the bz (doesn't seem to be an open bug for
kannel):

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=414381

Also, bacula has closed ACLs, so nobody can currently rebuild the
package if and when this packaging issue is resolved. Can somebody
please open them up?

Alex

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 01-06-2008, 11:14 AM
Caolan McNamara
 
Default rawhide report: bacula/kannel -> mktexlsr ?

On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 16:24 -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote:
> In the bacula case here is the bz (doesn't seem to be an open bug for
> kannel):
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=414381
>
> Also, bacula has closed ACLs, so nobody can currently rebuild the
> package if and when this packaging issue is resolved. Can somebody
> please open them up?

Well I think that anyone can run make build and get it built as rel-eng
bumped the nvr of it previously and there hasn't been a successful build
so if the latex2html thing is the real problem and it gets fixed and no
changes to bacula are needed we can just build it post out-of-package
fix.

C.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 01-06-2008, 04:32 PM
Jason L Tibbitts III
 
Default rawhide report: bacula/kannel -> mktexlsr ?

>>>>> "AL" == Alex Lancaster <alexl@users.sourceforge.net> writes:

AL> Also, bacula has closed ACLs, so nobody can currently rebuild the
AL> package if and when this packaging issue is resolved. Can
AL> somebody please open them up?

I wouldn't open them up without consulting the maintainer, but a few
of us can still rebuild it if the underlying problem gets fixed.

BTW, I tried manually specifying TEXINPUTS in the bacula build which I
hoped would force the searching of the directory with html.sty but
that didn't help and I'm not quite sure why.

- J<

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 10:50 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org