If so then I see (from a quick google) that locally running "mktexlsr"
before trying to build them was sufficient to give me two successful
builds. I can't add that to the affected .specs themselves so I suspect
that some TeX package in the dependency chain should effectively run
mktexlsr as root during install. Or something of that nature, I'm
vague on the TeX world.
C.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
CM> So, what exactly is the current problem with these two ? Is it
CM> just the mysterious failure of TeX to execute some stuff, i.e.
Yes, I debugged this the other day. The problem for bacula is that
latex2html somehow does not properly run texhash in %post, so nothing
can find html.sty. If you force a texhash it works. Changing the
post scriptlet for latex2html to not use "/usr/bin/env -
/usr/bin/texhash" but to just call texhash directly works. I don't
know why.
CM> " latex -interaction=batchmode bacula.tex
Remove -interaction=batchmode to see errors from latex.
- J<
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
CM> So, what exactly is the current problem with these two ? Is it
CM> just the mysterious failure of TeX to execute some stuff, i.e.
>>>>> "JT" == Jason L Tibbitts writes:
JT> Yes, I debugged this the other day. The problem for bacula is
JT> that latex2html somehow does not properly run texhash in %post,
JT> so nothing can find html.sty. If you force a texhash it works.
JT> Changing the post scriptlet for latex2html to not use
JT> "/usr/bin/env - /usr/bin/texhash" but to just call texhash
JT> directly works. I don't know why.
JT> Remove -interaction=batchmode to see errors from latex.
In the bacula case here is the bz (doesn't seem to be an open bug for
kannel):
Also, bacula has closed ACLs, so nobody can currently rebuild the
package if and when this packaging issue is resolved. Can somebody
please open them up?
Alex
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
01-06-2008, 11:14 AM
Caolan McNamara
rawhide report: bacula/kannel -> mktexlsr ?
On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 16:24 -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote:
> In the bacula case here is the bz (doesn't seem to be an open bug for
> kannel):
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=414381
>
> Also, bacula has closed ACLs, so nobody can currently rebuild the
> package if and when this packaging issue is resolved. Can somebody
> please open them up?
Well I think that anyone can run make build and get it built as rel-eng
bumped the nvr of it previously and there hasn't been a successful build
so if the latex2html thing is the real problem and it gets fixed and no
changes to bacula are needed we can just build it post out-of-package
fix.
C.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
01-06-2008, 04:32 PM
Jason L Tibbitts III
rawhide report: bacula/kannel -> mktexlsr ?
>>>>> "AL" == Alex Lancaster <alexl@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
AL> Also, bacula has closed ACLs, so nobody can currently rebuild the
AL> package if and when this packaging issue is resolved. Can
AL> somebody please open them up?
I wouldn't open them up without consulting the maintainer, but a few
of us can still rebuild it if the underlying problem gets fixed.
BTW, I tried manually specifying TEXINPUTS in the bacula build which I
hoped would force the searching of the directory with html.sty but
that didn't help and I'm not quite sure why.
- J<
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
rawhide report: bacula/kannel -> mktexlsr ?
