FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 01-04-2008, 11:11 AM
Neal Becker
 
Default tetex-fonts replacement?

I received this message today:

dblatex has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
On x86_64:
dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
On i386:
dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
On ppc64:
dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 01-04-2008, 11:18 AM
Patrice Dumas
 
Default tetex-fonts replacement?

On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 07:11:55AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> I received this message today:
>
> dblatex has broken dependencies in the development tree:
> On ppc:
> dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
> On x86_64:
> dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
> On i386:
> dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
> On ppc64:
> dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
> Please resolve this as soon as possible.

I just filled a bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427521

Hopefully will be fixed soon.

--
Pat

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 01-04-2008, 11:23 AM
drago01
 
Default tetex-fonts replacement?

Neal Becker wrote:

I received this message today:

dblatex has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
On x86_64:
dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
On i386:
dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
On ppc64:
dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
Please resolve this as soon as possible.




you will have to require texlive instead on rawhide.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 01-04-2008, 11:47 AM
Jindrich Novy
 
Default tetex-fonts replacement?

On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 07:11:55AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> I received this message today:
>
> dblatex has broken dependencies in the development tree:
> On ppc:
> dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
> On x86_64:
> dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
> On i386:
> dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
> On ppc64:
> dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
> Please resolve this as soon as possible.
>

This is caused by texlive and texlive-fonts package merge. The texlive
package contains:

Obsoletes: texlive-fonts < 2007-6
Provides: texlive-fonts = 2007-6

What should have fixed the missing texlive-fonts by providing it by
the main texlive package. It doesn't work for some reason so will need
to have a look at it.

Jindrich

--
Jindrich Novy <jnovy@redhat.com> http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 01-04-2008, 11:50 AM
Jindrich Novy
 
Default tetex-fonts replacement?

On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 01:47:18PM +0100, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 07:11:55AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> > I received this message today:
> >
> > dblatex has broken dependencies in the development tree:
> > On ppc:
> > dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
> > On x86_64:
> > dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
> > On i386:
> > dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
> > On ppc64:
> > dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
> > Please resolve this as soon as possible.
> >
>
> This is caused by texlive and texlive-fonts package merge. The texlive
> package contains:
>
> Obsoletes: texlive-fonts < 2007-6
> Provides: texlive-fonts = 2007-6
>
> What should have fixed the missing texlive-fonts by providing it by
> the main texlive package. It doesn't work for some reason so will need
> to have a look at it.
>

Ok, in case of *tetex-fonts*, to add the virtual provide for it is a
trivial fix. I'll build it today. The texlive-fonts virtual provides
work good as expected of course.

Jindrich

--
Jindrich Novy <jnovy@redhat.com> http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 01-04-2008, 12:20 PM
"Jonathan Underwood"
 
Default tetex-fonts replacement?

On 04/01/2008, Jindrich Novy <jnovy@redhat.com> wrote:

> This is caused by texlive and texlive-fonts package merge. The texlive
> package contains:
>
> Obsoletes: texlive-fonts < 2007-6
> Provides: texlive-fonts = 2007-6
>
> What should have fixed the missing texlive-fonts by providing it by
> the main texlive package. It doesn't work for some reason so will need
> to have a look at it.

Surely you need

Obsoletes: tetex-fonts
Provides: tetex-fonts

(probably with some versioning) in the texlive-fonts package, rather
than what you have above.

J.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 08:40 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org