Alex Lancaster said the following on 01/04/2008 12:52 AM Pacific Time:
"TM" == Till Maas writes:
Nope. It hasn't been updated since August 2007 doesn't follow the
current feature template.
TM> The last update was 2007-11-12 according to
TM> Only the date written on the page itself was not updated. Afaik
TM> this feature is already available in rawhide btw.
It's similar with xulrunner (updated 2007-12-31):
It appears to have been removed as a Fedora 9 feature, but the feature
This is not true. It was never part of
is already in rawhide. One missing item that doesn't conform to the
template is that there doesn't appear to be a contingency plan, but it
You are correct. FESCo often asks what the contingency plan is when
reviewing features for acceptance. This particular feature was in
CategoryProposedFedora9--meaning that it was being put forth for a FESCo
vote. I sent mail to the feature owner directly and posted status here
a couple weeks ago. Receiving no respose I moved it to
would be very difficult to back out the feature now as many packages
have been rebuilt against xulrunner already and the old firefox-devel
package has been removed.
Nobody is calling for this
fedora-devel-list mailing list