On Sa Dezember 29 2007, Xavier Lamien wrote:

> If someone else could perform an make tag action to check this, it'd be
> great.

The user notting deleted the file "branch", I guess by accident:
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/g-wrap/EL-5/?hideattic=0

You need to create it with:
echo EL-5 >> branch
in the EL-5 subdir. Otherwise the Makefile does not know which branch it is
in.

Regards,
Till
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 21:14:29 +0100, Xavier Lamien wrote:

> Hello,
>
> When tried to make tag EL-5 branch, i fallen on this following error :
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [SmootherFrOgZ@lxtbuild EL-5]$ make tag
> cvs tag -c g-wrap-1_9_9-5_fc9
> ERROR: The tag g-wrap-1_9_9-5_fc9 is already applied on a different branch
> ERROR: You can not forcibly move tags between branches
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I had to proceed as follow to fix this :
> HEAD_BRANCH=EL-5 make tag
>
> If someone else could perform an make tag action to check this, it'd be
> great.

Undelete the "branch" file. Put "EL-5" in it.
Compare with your EL-4 branch if you are unsure.
I could help, but ACLs are in place.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

2007/12/29, Till Maas <opensource@till.name>:
On Sa Dezember 29 2007, Xavier Lamien wrote:

> If someone else could perform an make tag action to check this, it'd be
> great.

The user notting deleted the file "branch", I guess by accident:

http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/g-wrap/EL-5/?hideattic=0

You need to create it with:
echo EL-5 >> branch
in the EL-5 subdir. Otherwise the Makefile does not know which branch it is

in.
I could see that the Makefile.common's looking for file branch and if it doesn't find it set $HEAD_BRANCH to devel branch as default branch.

It wouldn't be more simple to print an error message instead of set it to devel if this file is missing ?


Regards,
Till

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list

fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list



--

Xavier.t Lamien
--
French Fedora Ambassador
Fedora/EPEL Contributor******| http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 22:18:16 +0100
"Xavier Lamien" <laxathom@fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> It wouldn't be more simple to print an error message instead of set it to
> devel if this file is missing ?

Not really since devel does not have branch files since it is not branched.

- Andreas

--
Andreas Bierfert, B.Sc. | http://awbsworld.de | GPG: C58CF1CB
andreas.bierfert@lowlatency.de | http://lowlatency.de | signed/encrypted
phone: +49 2402 102373 | cell: +49 173 5803043 | mail preferred
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list