FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 12-12-2008, 03:25 PM
Orion Poplawski
 
Default Updates QA/karma question

Another update issue that raises some questions -

- Does anyone actually read the comments in bodhi before allowing the
push request to proceed?


Case in point:

================================================== ==============================
rpcbind-0.1.7-1.fc9
================================================== ==============================
Update ID: FEDORA-2008-10000
Release: Fedora 9
Status: stable
Type: enhancement
Karma: 0
Notes: Updated to latest upstream version: 0.1.7 which fixes a
number of

: problems.
Submitter: steved
Submitted: 2008-11-21 10:48:00
Comments: steved - 2008-11-21 10:48:00 (karma 0)
This update has been submitted for testing
bodhi - 2008-11-22 16:52:27 (karma 0)
This update has been pushed to testing
thethirddoorontheleft@comcast.net (unauthenticated) -
2008-11-25 05:35:58 (karma -1)

Causes nfs statd to fail at bootup
orion - 2008-11-25 16:24:51 (karma -1)
Needs selinux changes. Fails to start with selinux
enforcing.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472917
steved - 2008-12-09 18:59:31 (karma 1)
selinux-policy-targeted-3.3.1-115.fc9 is now available
which does take care of the Selinux problem. Please up
update and try again...
steved - 2008-12-10 00:04:27 (karma 0)
This update has been submitted for stable
orion - 2008-12-10 16:12:46 (karma -1)
This should not be pushed to stable until selinux-
policy-targeted-3.3.1-115.fc9 has been pushed to
stable.
bodhi - 2008-12-11 07:58:07 (karma 0)
This update has been pushed to stable

http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-10000

- Should update submitters be allowed to give positive karma to their
updates? Seems like that they are too biased.


- Is there any requirement that an update have positive karma before
being pushed to stable?



As of now, rpcbind will fail to start on F-9 with selinux in enforcing
mode (esp. important on servers!) until
selinux-policy-targeted-3.3.1-115.fc9 is pushed to stable. Seems like
we could have waited for that.


Dec 12 09:16:11 xenf9 yum: Updated: rpcbind-0.1.7-1.fc9.i386
Dec 12 09:18:21 xenf9 rpcbind: rpcbind terminating on signal. Restart
with "rpcbind -w"
Dec 12 09:18:21 xenf9 rpcbind: setgid to 'rpc' (32) failed: Operation
not permitted
Dec 12 09:18:21 xenf9 kernel: type=1400 audit(1229098701.631:5): avc:
denied {setgid } for pid=2412 comm="rpcbind" capability=6
scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:rpcbind_t:s0
tcontext=unconfined_u:system_r:rpcbind_t:s0 tclass=capability



We really need to work on this updates system.

--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion@cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 04:30 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org