ace name conflict (was: rawhide report: 20081126 changes)
Rawhide Report wrote:
> New package ace > Appliance Configuration Engine Hmmm, this has a name conflict with another ace, from: http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE.html which has packages for Fedora named "ace": http://dist.bonsai.com/ken/ace_tao_rpm/ These have existed for a while already. So what is the way out of this mess? Right now the packages trip on each other and they're completely different. By the way, there's also a proprietary packer called "ace", but it has no GNU/Linux version (only unace is available), so that one is unlikely to be a problem. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list |
ace name conflict (was: rawhide report: 20081126 changes)
Kevin Kofler (kevin.kofler@chello.at) said:
> Rawhide Report wrote: > > New package ace > > Appliance Configuration Engine > > Hmmm, this has a name conflict with another ace, from: > http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE.html > which has packages for Fedora named "ace": > http://dist.bonsai.com/ken/ace_tao_rpm/ > These have existed for a while already. > > So what is the way out of this mess? Right now the packages trip on each > other and they're completely different. Is there a reason the other ACE isn't in Fedora (no volunteers is a valid reason). It certainly predates the just added one. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 02:35 PM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.