Tidy up of the xs-0.5 yum repo - what differentiates OLPC's XS from vanilla Fedora?
A useful bit of info, and a chance ot say thanks :-) The composition
on the XS release 0.5 breaks down like this.
A couple of packages that are in Fedora rawhide (or making a beeline
for it), but we needed ahead of time - thanks to the many Fedorans
that jumped in and helped!:
./pam_sotp-0.3.3-3.fc9.i386.rpm
./rssh-2.3.2-1.fc7.i386.rpm
./rssh-2.3.2-5.fc7.i386.rpm
./rssh-debuginfo-2.3.2-1.fc7.i386.rpm
./rssh-debuginfo-2.3.2-5.fc7.i386.rpm
./usbmount-0.15.6.olpc-1.xs7.noarch.rpm
./fakeroot-1.9.6-16.fc7.i386.rpm (an old, buggy version is in F9)
./fakeroot-debuginfo-1.9.6-16.fc7.i386.rpm
A couple packages with custom patches...
./ejabberd-xs-2.0.1-10.xs9.olpc.i386.rpm
./ejabberd-xs-2.0.1-11.fc9.olpc.i386.rpm
./moodle-xs-1.9.2.xs2.13.gdeb43cf-1.xs9.noarch.rpm
Luckily, the OLPC XS delta isn't as large or as punishing as the XO
delta. We do use anaconda and yum in perhaps new and unexpected ways
-- we're right now hurting a bit on those fronts. OTOH, just like the
XO, we need smaller memory and disk footprints, through
less/better/smaller daemons and smarter, tighter dependencies (which
have improved quite a bit lately - thanks!).
cheers,
martin
--
martin@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
- ask interesting questions
- don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
- http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list