tzdata in FC10 is older than the one in FC9
 

In fc9 we have tzdata-2008i while in fc10 there is tzdata-2008h...

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

tzdata in FC10 is older than the one in FC9
 

Davide Moretti <dave@rimini.com> writes:
> In fc9 we have tzdata-2008i while in fc10 there is tzdata-2008h...

Most likely it's queued for a zero-day update. I've got a couple
packages that are in similar states --- it's not worth trying to
persuade the release honchos to respin F10 for minor updates.

regards, tom lane

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

tzdata in FC10 is older than the one in FC9
 

Le dimanche 16 novembre 2008 à 12:07 -0500, Tom Lane a écrit :
> Davide Moretti <dave@rimini.com> writes:
> > In fc9 we have tzdata-2008i while in fc10 there is tzdata-2008h...
>
> Most likely it's queued for a zero-day update.

It's not in Fedora 11 rawhide either.

Most likely the tzdata maintainer did not update rawhide first, with the
usual "updates for Fedora X are newer than stuff in Fedora X+1) effects.

Please always push packages in fedora-devel first. Thanks.

--
Nicolas Mailhot
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

tzdata in FC10 is older than the one in FC9
 

Nicolas Mailhot wrote:

Le dimanche 16 novembre 2008 à 12:07 -0500, Tom Lane a écrit :

Davide Moretti <dave@rimini.com> writes:

In fc9 we have tzdata-2008i while in fc10 there is tzdata-2008h...
Most likely it's queued for a zero-day update.


It's not in Fedora 11 rawhide either.


I've done the devel build sometime back, when F-10 was already frozen
and F-11 not yet forked (unless you asked explicitly I guess). So devel
build went into F-10, which I scheduled for update as soon as bodhi was
capable of that. I never did true rawhide build, but am doing it now.


PM

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

tzdata in FC10 is older than the one in FC9
 

On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 18:25 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> It's not in Fedora 11 rawhide either.
>
> Most likely the tzdata maintainer did not update rawhide first, with the
> usual "updates for Fedora X are newer than stuff in Fedora X+1) effects.

Even more likely was that the build /was/ done on devel first, and devel
was F-10. But we were frozen and the build didn't automatically go into
rawhide. Once the update goes out for F-10, it'll be inherited into F11
(rawhide).

In the future, the window where we are frozen but not branched will
either be extremely small or non-existent. The improvements we've made
to the speed of the branching make it a far less costly task and more
suitable to do during the crunch time that is just before or just after
the final freeze.

--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list