FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

» Linux Archive
Home
New Posts
Search
FAQ


Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 10-10-2008, 02:33 PM
Christoph Wickert
 
Default Package review backlog.

Am Freitag, den 10.10.2008, 14:14 +0100 schrieb David Woodhouse:

> I propose that each FESCo member should try to work on at least one
> package review per week. Each week at the FESCo meeting, we'll ask
> members which reviews they've worked on in the past week.
>
> It won't be _mandatory_ --
[snipped]

As a rule of thumb it's ok, but it should not be mandatory. I think the
FESCo members are already having a lot of work to do and I'm not sure if
everybody has enough spare time for reviews.

But perhaps we should think about making your proposal mandatory for
sponsors and - more important - for people who want to become a sponsor.

Christoph

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 10-10-2008, 03:06 PM
Patrice Dumas
 
Default Package review backlog.

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 03:33:33PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 10.10.2008, 14:14 +0100 schrieb David Woodhouse:
>
> > I propose that each FESCo member should try to work on at least one
> > package review per week. Each week at the FESCo meeting, we'll ask
> > members which reviews they've worked on in the past week.
> >
> > It won't be _mandatory_ --
> [snipped]
>
> But perhaps we should think about making your proposal mandatory for
> sponsors and - more important - for people who want to become a sponsor.

This is taken into account in (secret) discussions about sponsors. Maybe
not enough, but as far as I can tell most sponsors have a good record of
reviews. There are certainly exception, but considering that the 3 who
do many reviews are sponsors, the balance for sponsors is very
positive... But it has to be that way, because it is easier to submit
packages than to do review (in my opinion) so experienced people should
have a positive balance if things are to work smoothly.

--
Pat

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 10-10-2008, 03:22 PM
"Richard W.M. Jones"
 
Default Package review backlog.

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 02:14:08PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> I propose that each FESCo member should try to work on at least one
> package review per week. Each week at the FESCo meeting, we'll ask
> members which reviews they've worked on in the past week.
[...]
> And anyone else who considers themselves an active member of the Fedora
> development community should also try to do the same. If one a week
> isn't realistic due to other commitments, set yourself a more relaxed
> target -- like one a fortnight, or one a month, and try to stick to
> that.

I think this is an excellent idea.

Rich.

--
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 06:17 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org