Dead or alive package

10-09-2008, 01:37 AM

This package is marked as dead.package in CVS. Did I miss something, or
where shall I file the bug?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

10-09-2008, 01:41 AM

On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 01:37 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> This package is marked as dead.package in CVS. Did I miss something, or
> where shall I file the bug?

It didn't get blocked until Oct 1st, which was after the rebuild attempt
happened. Just close the FTBFS bug as WONTFIX with the explanation that
it has been retired.

--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

10-09-2008, 01:51 AM

On Wednesday 08 October 2008 20:41:02 Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 01:37 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > This package is marked as dead.package in CVS. Did I miss something, or
> > where shall I file the bug?
>
> It didn't get blocked until Oct 1st, which was after the rebuild attempt
> happened. Just close the FTBFS bug as WONTFIX with the explanation that
> it has been retired.

I thought it was marked dead.package, because bluez-utils was obsoleted by
bluez or something like that, not because of the FTBFS bug.

--
Jarod Wilson
jarod@redhat.com

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

10-09-2008, 04:17 AM

Jarod Wilson <jarod <at> redhat.com> writes:
> I thought it was marked dead.package, because bluez-utils was obsoleted by
> bluez or something like that, not because of the FTBFS bug.

Sure, but it's kinda pointless to fix bugs in an obsolete package. ;-)

Kevin Kofler

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

10-10-2008, 02:58 PM

On Wednesday 08 October 2008 23:17:32 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jarod Wilson <jarod <at> redhat.com> writes:
> > I thought it was marked dead.package, because bluez-utils was obsoleted
> > by bluez or something like that, not because of the FTBFS bug.
>
> Sure, but it's kinda pointless to fix bugs in an obsolete package. ;-)

I had the impression Bastien was asking if the package had been marked dead
because of the FTBFS bug. I probably mis-parsed something though.

--
Jarod Wilson
jarod@redhat.com

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list