Going to install httpd-debuginfo and php-debuginfo:

---> Package httpd-debuginfo.i386 0:2.2.9-1.fc9 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: mod_ssl.so for package: httpd-debuginfo
---> Package php-debuginfo.i386 0:5.2.6-2.fc9 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: xmlreader.so for package: php-debuginfo
--> Processing Dependency: libphp5-5.2.6.so for package: php-debuginfo
--> Processing Dependency: tidy.so for package: php-debuginfo
--> Processing Dependency: pgsql.so for package: php-debuginfo
--> Processing Dependency: gd.so for package: php-debuginfo
--> Processing Dependency: xmlwriter.so for package: php-debuginfo
--> Processing Dependency: dba.so for package: php-debuginfo
--> Processing Dependency: imap.so for package: php-debuginfo
--> Processing Dependency: dom.so for package: php-debuginfo
--> Processing Dependency: mhash.so for package: php-debuginfo
--> Processing Dependency: mcrypt.so for package: php-debuginfo
--> Processing Dependency: xsl.so for package: php-debuginfo
--> Processing Dependency: ldap.so for package: php-debuginfo
--> Processing Dependency: xmlrpc.so for package: php-debuginfo
--> Processing Dependency: ncurses.so for package: php-debuginfo
--> Processing Dependency: bcmath.so for package: php-debuginfo
--> Processing Dependency: pdo_pgsql.so for package: php-debuginfo
--> Processing Dependency: mbstring.so for package: php-debuginfo
--> Processing Dependency: odbc.so for package: php-debuginfo
--> Processing Dependency: mssql.so for package: php-debuginfo
--> Processing Dependency: pdo_odbc.so for package: php-debuginfo
--> Processing Dependency: pspell.so for package: php-debuginfo
--> Processing Dependency: soap.so for package: php-debuginfo

Are these dependencies in the debuginfo packages really appropriate?
I'm not going to be debugging these extra code paths - just the packages
already installed.


Should this get fixed? Where?

--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion@cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

That looks like automatic soname dependencies being generated in the
debuginfo rpms. This is supposed to be prevented by the line:

AutoReqProv: 0

in /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros, from redhat-rpm-config.

The rawhide rpms don't have these extra requires and provides.
I don't know why F-9's debuginfo rpms do have them.


Thanks,
Roland

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 01:17:06 +0200, Roland McGrath wrote:
> The rawhide rpms don't have these extra requires and provides.
> I don't know why F-9's debuginfo rpms do have them.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427579

it missed the time F9 was mass-rebuilt.


Regards,
Jan

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list