http://eGroupWare.org
It is sponsored by RedHat. Download page present links to src.rpm (from
openSUSE buildservice
<http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/server:/eGroupWare/> ) so
I think it is not hard porting for Fedora.
Any legal issues? On first look it is GPLv2 and GPLv3. So, why it is not
here (I also check reviews in progress)? Or it just wait maintainer and
I can try make review request?


With best regards, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus).

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 20:14 +0400, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
wrote:
> http://eGroupWare.org
> It is sponsored by RedHat. Download page present links to src.rpm (from
> openSUSE buildservice
> <http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/server:/eGroupWare/> ) so
> I think it is not hard porting for Fedora.
> Any legal issues? On first look it is GPLv2 and GPLv3. So, why it is not
> here (I also check reviews in progress)? Or it just wait maintainer and
> I can try make review request?
>

I think it just needs a maintainer/packager.

Feel free to apply for it.

thanks!
-sv


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 12:17:13PM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 20:14 +0400, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
> wrote:
> > http://eGroupWare.org
> > It is sponsored by RedHat. Download page present links to src.rpm (from
> > openSUSE buildservice
> > <http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/server:/eGroupWare/> ) so
> > I think it is not hard porting for Fedora.
> > Any legal issues? On first look it is GPLv2 and GPLv3. So, why it is not
> > here (I also check reviews in progress)? Or it just wait maintainer and
> > I can try make review request?
> >
>
> I think it just needs a maintainer/packager.
>
> Feel free to apply for it.

egroupware looks really nice. As did opengroupware before I attempted
packaging it. :/

I'd really like to push some more groupware bits into Fedora and see
which one is the fittest. egroupware does look a bit easier to
package, and if there is interest from more than one person we already
have a packager and a reviewer!

Pavel, do you want to attack this and have me review it?

IIRC correctly there was some attempt in forming a Fedora groupware
SIG. What happened to it?
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 10:27:49PM +0300, Axel Thimm wrote:

> I'd really like to push some more groupware bits into Fedora and see
> which one is the fittest. egroupware does look a bit easier to
> package, and if there is interest from more than one person we already
> have a packager and a reviewer!
>
> Pavel, do you want to attack this and have me review it?

I'm offering my help in reviewing and maybe a bit more too, if that helps.
I've just downloaded that src.rpm from the SUSE build service, but there
might be quite some work in making this a "good" rpm.

--
-- Jos Vos <jos@xos.nl>
-- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
-- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Axel Thimm пишет:

On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 12:17:13PM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:


On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 20:14 +0400, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
wrote:


http://eGroupWare.org
It is sponsored by RedHat. Download page present links to src.rpm (from
openSUSE buildservice
<http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/server:/eGroupWare/> ) so
I think it is not hard porting for Fedora.
Any legal issues? On first look it is GPLv2 and GPLv3. So, why it is not
here (I also check reviews in progress)? Or it just wait maintainer and
I can try make review request?




I think it just needs a maintainer/packager.

Feel free to apply for it.



egroupware looks really nice. As did opengroupware before I attempted
packaging it. :/

I'd really like to push some more groupware bits into Fedora and see
which one is the fittest. egroupware does look a bit easier to
package, and if there is interest from more than one person we already
have a packager and a reviewer!

Pavel, do you want to attack this and have me review it?


I can try. But now for me more interesting egroupware than packaging it
So, I have now 2 packages in progress, and if meanwhile someone do not
start working on it I can try "making this a "good" rpm" ( (C) Jos Vos )

IIRC correctly there was some attempt in forming a Fedora groupware
SIG. What happened to it?



--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list