I've just built xmms-1.2.11-20071117cvs for rawhide. It should hit
whenever there is a rawhide push (god knows when that will be ;-p).
If you're using the livna mp3 plugin, you will not be able to update
directly as that plugin required the old xmms-lib; if you download xmms
from ftp though, you can install it with --no-deps and it works fine. I
hope whoever looks after that for livna will be quick on the rebuild for
it.
Quite a few of the old patches have gone as they've made it to the
1.2.11 branch already. The only one which concerns me is the
alsa-backport patch which looks like the functionality has been included
in the new source.
Any problems, bugzilla!
TTFN
Paul
--
Sie können mich aufreizen und wirklich heiß machen!
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
09-03-2008, 12:06 PM
Thorsten Leemhuis
xmms heads up
On 03.09.2008 00:25, Paul wrote:
If you're using the livna mp3 plugin, you will not be able to update
directly as that plugin required the old xmms-lib; if you download xmms
from ftp though, you can install it with --no-deps and it works fine. I
hope whoever looks after that for livna will be quick on the rebuild for
it.
You could have mailed the Livna/RPM Fusion maintainers (CCed) in advance
to coordinate things, then we could have prepared a update to release it
in sync ;-) Sure, a mail on fedora-devel-list will often do the trick,
but it's easily missed.
Cu
knurd
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
09-03-2008, 03:10 PM
Michael Schwendt
xmms heads up
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:25:46 +0100, Paul wrote:
> I've just built xmms-1.2.11-20071117cvs for rawhide. It should hit
> whenever there is a rawhide push (god knows when that will be ;-p).
You've reverted the licence fix in the spec file and removed also
the corresponding changelog entry. Why?
Also, are other external xmms plugins in Fedora affected by
your update?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
09-03-2008, 08:37 PM
"Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski"
xmms heads up
On Wednesday, 03 September 2008 at 17:10, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:25:46 +0100, Paul wrote:
>
> > I've just built xmms-1.2.11-20071117cvs for rawhide. It should hit
> > whenever there is a rawhide push (god knows when that will be ;-p).
>
> You've reverted the licence fix in the spec file and removed also
> the corresponding changelog entry. Why?
I bet he used cvs-import.sh.
Regards,
R.
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
Livna http://rpm.livna.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
09-10-2008, 07:32 PM
Michael Schwendt
xmms heads up
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 17:10:01 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:25:46 +0100, Paul wrote:
>
> > I've just built xmms-1.2.11-20071117cvs for rawhide. It should hit
> > whenever there is a rawhide push (god knows when that will be ;-p).
>
> You've reverted the licence fix in the spec file and removed also
> the corresponding changelog entry. Why?
Ping.
Between xmms-1_2_10-39_fc10 and xmms-1_2_11-1_20071117cvs_fc10 you
reverted Jason's licence change and %changelog entry in xmms.spec.
You changed the licence field from GPLv2+ to GPLv2, while the source
files say that GPLv2+ would be correct.
Your changelog entry says
Alter license
which is not verbose enough in this case.
--
Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@fedoraproject.org>
Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) - Linux 2.6.26.3-12.fc8
loadavg: 1.80 1.87 1.77
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
09-10-2008, 07:44 PM
Paul
xmms heads up
Hi,
> Between xmms-1_2_10-39_fc10 and xmms-1_2_11-1_20071117cvs_fc10 you
> reverted Jason's licence change and %changelog entry in xmms.spec.
>
> You changed the licence field from GPLv2+ to GPLv2, while the source
> files say that GPLv2+ would be correct.
Fixed. Sorry about that, not sure why the reversion occured!
TTFN
Paul
--
Sie können mich aufreizen und wirklich heiß machen!
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list