FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 08-20-2008, 05:43 PM
Jason L Tibbitts III
 
Default Package Review SIG

>>>>> "HdG" == Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl> writes:

HdG> So I want to use this opportunity to offer my help to reviewers
HdG> for any technical issues which arise during package reviews (for
HdG> example help the packager solving selinux execstack or textrel
HdG> issues).

Yes, I would hope that the SIG could do this on a more organized basis
and perhaps produce some additional documentation which could help
packagers with these kinds of problems.

- J<

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 08-20-2008, 05:46 PM
Hans de Goede
 
Default Package Review SIG

Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:

I would like to begin organizing a SIG for package reviews and the
issues surrounding them. I spent a couple of minutes to create
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Package_Review and put in a couple
of tidbits. Everyone is welcome; interested parties should respond
here or, if you wish, privately to me.

Organization is not a particularly strong suit of mine, so I
particularly welcome anyone who is willing to step up and help me get
this thing rolling.



I think thats a great initiative and I would like to thank you and all the
other people who are doing reviews on a non trading basis for all your efforts!


Not really related to this SIG, but I while we are on the subject. Around 90 %
of reviews / packages are pretty standard, but some can be really tricky. So I
want to use this opportunity to offer my help to reviewers for any technical
issues which arise during package reviews (for example help the packager
solving selinux execstack or textrel issues).



Regards,

Hans

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 08-20-2008, 05:56 PM
"Jon Ciesla"
 
Default Package Review SIG

> I would like to begin organizing a SIG for package reviews and the
> issues surrounding them. I spent a couple of minutes to create
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Package_Review and put in a couple
> of tidbits. Everyone is welcome; interested parties should respond
> here or, if you wish, privately to me.
>
> Organization is not a particularly strong suit of mine, so I
> particularly welcome anyone who is willing to step up and help me get
> this thing rolling.

Thinking out loud, it might be nice to link another set of review bugs,
the ones where the submitter needs a sponsor, so people can focus their
efforts where they can do the most good.

> - J<
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>


--
novus ordo absurdum

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 08-20-2008, 06:00 PM
Jason L Tibbitts III
 
Default Package Review SIG

>>>>> "JC" == Jon Ciesla <limb@jcomserv.net> writes:

JC> Thinking out loud, it might be nice to link another set of review
JC> bugs, the ones where the submitter needs a sponsor, so people can
JC> focus their efforts where they can do the most good.

Well, the list has the NEEDSPONSOR tags listed in green; are you
suggesting that they need to be in a separate document altogether?
It wouldn't be terribly hard if I can ever finish beating those report
scripts into shape, but I'm not really sure I see the utility.

- J<

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 08-20-2008, 06:14 PM
"Debarshi Ray"
 
Default Package Review SIG

> Everyone is welcome; interested parties should respond
> here or, if you wish, privately to me.

Interested.

Happy hacking,
Debarshi

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 08-20-2008, 06:14 PM
"Debarshi Ray"
 
Default Package Review SIG

> Everyone is welcome; interested parties should respond
> here or, if you wish, privately to me.

Interested.

Happy hacking,
Debarshi

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 08-20-2008, 11:41 PM
Brian Pepple
 
Default Package Review SIG

On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 12:18 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> I would like to begin organizing a SIG for package reviews and the
> issues surrounding them. I spent a couple of minutes to create
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Package_Review and put in a couple
> of tidbits. Everyone is welcome; interested parties should respond
> here or, if you wish, privately to me.

I'm interested in joining.

Later,
/B
--
Brian Pepple <bpepple@fedoraproject.org>

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 08-20-2008, 11:46 PM
Rahul Sundaram
 
Default Package Review SIG

Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:

I would like to begin organizing a SIG for package reviews and the
issues surrounding them. I spent a couple of minutes to create
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Package_Review and put in a couple
of tidbits. Everyone is welcome; interested parties should respond
here or, if you wish, privately to me.


I am interested.

Rahul

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 08-21-2008, 12:40 PM
Jason L Tibbitts III
 
Default Package Review SIG

It might be worthwhile to point out to folks that, while some critical
portions of the Fedora infrastructure remain down, you can still
review packages. There are plenty to choose from. The full list of
packages up for review is at:
http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.htm

The wiki is up so that you can view the packaging guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
and the mirrors remain up so that you can install mock and do test
builds.

- J<

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 08-21-2008, 01:02 PM
Jason L Tibbitts III
 
Default Package Review SIG

>>>>> "JLT" == Jason L Tibbitts <tibbs@math.uh.edu> writes:

JLT> http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.htm

I trimmed an 'l':
http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 01:16 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org