>>>>> "HdG" == Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl> writes:
HdG> So I want to use this opportunity to offer my help to reviewers
HdG> for any technical issues which arise during package reviews (for
HdG> example help the packager solving selinux execstack or textrel
HdG> issues).
Yes, I would hope that the SIG could do this on a more organized basis
and perhaps produce some additional documentation which could help
packagers with these kinds of problems.
- J<
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
08-20-2008, 05:46 PM
Hans de Goede
Package Review SIG
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
I would like to begin organizing a SIG for package reviews and the
issues surrounding them. I spent a couple of minutes to create
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Package_Review and put in a couple
of tidbits. Everyone is welcome; interested parties should respond
here or, if you wish, privately to me.
Organization is not a particularly strong suit of mine, so I
particularly welcome anyone who is willing to step up and help me get
this thing rolling.
I think thats a great initiative and I would like to thank you and all the
other people who are doing reviews on a non trading basis for all your efforts!
Not really related to this SIG, but I while we are on the subject. Around 90 %
of reviews / packages are pretty standard, but some can be really tricky. So I
want to use this opportunity to offer my help to reviewers for any technical
issues which arise during package reviews (for example help the packager
solving selinux execstack or textrel issues).
Regards,
Hans
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
08-20-2008, 05:56 PM
"Jon Ciesla"
Package Review SIG
> I would like to begin organizing a SIG for package reviews and the
> issues surrounding them. I spent a couple of minutes to create
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Package_Review and put in a couple
> of tidbits. Everyone is welcome; interested parties should respond
> here or, if you wish, privately to me.
>
> Organization is not a particularly strong suit of mine, so I
> particularly welcome anyone who is willing to step up and help me get
> this thing rolling.
Thinking out loud, it might be nice to link another set of review bugs,
the ones where the submitter needs a sponsor, so people can focus their
efforts where they can do the most good.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
08-20-2008, 06:00 PM
Jason L Tibbitts III
Package Review SIG
>>>>> "JC" == Jon Ciesla <limb@jcomserv.net> writes:
JC> Thinking out loud, it might be nice to link another set of review
JC> bugs, the ones where the submitter needs a sponsor, so people can
JC> focus their efforts where they can do the most good.
Well, the list has the NEEDSPONSOR tags listed in green; are you
suggesting that they need to be in a separate document altogether?
It wouldn't be terribly hard if I can ever finish beating those report
scripts into shape, but I'm not really sure I see the utility.
- J<
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
08-20-2008, 06:14 PM
"Debarshi Ray"
Package Review SIG
> Everyone is welcome; interested parties should respond
> here or, if you wish, privately to me.
Interested.
Happy hacking,
Debarshi
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
08-20-2008, 06:14 PM
"Debarshi Ray"
Package Review SIG
> Everyone is welcome; interested parties should respond
> here or, if you wish, privately to me.
Interested.
Happy hacking,
Debarshi
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
08-20-2008, 11:41 PM
Brian Pepple
Package Review SIG
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 12:18 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> I would like to begin organizing a SIG for package reviews and the
> issues surrounding them. I spent a couple of minutes to create
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Package_Review and put in a couple
> of tidbits. Everyone is welcome; interested parties should respond
> here or, if you wish, privately to me.
I'm interested in joining.
Later,
/B
--
Brian Pepple <bpepple@fedoraproject.org>
I would like to begin organizing a SIG for package reviews and the
issues surrounding them. I spent a couple of minutes to create
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Package_Review and put in a couple
of tidbits. Everyone is welcome; interested parties should respond
here or, if you wish, privately to me.
I am interested.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
08-21-2008, 12:40 PM
Jason L Tibbitts III
Package Review SIG
It might be worthwhile to point out to folks that, while some critical
portions of the Fedora infrastructure remain down, you can still
review packages. There are plenty to choose from. The full list of
packages up for review is at:
http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.htm
The wiki is up so that you can view the packaging guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
and the mirrors remain up so that you can install mock and do test
builds.
- J<
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
08-21-2008, 01:02 PM
Jason L Tibbitts III
Package Review SIG
>>>>> "JLT" == Jason L Tibbitts <tibbs@math.uh.edu> writes:
Package Review SIG
