On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 08:01:49 +0530, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> Rather than dropping bdftruncate entirely, perhaps simply put it in
> its own subpackage? You wouldn't need it to Require anything (the
> perl deps will be autogenerated), nor would xorg-x11-font-utils need
> to Require the bdftruncate subpackage, effectively solving the
> problem without dropping (semi) useful code.

I know I won't have my pony this time round, but if I could have my
druthers: that would be my preference too.

Cheers,
Christian

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 08:01 +0530, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:

> Rather than dropping bdftruncate entirely, perhaps simply put it in its
> own subpackage? You wouldn't need it to Require anything (the perl deps
> will be autogenerated), nor would xorg-x11-font-utils need to Require
> the bdftruncate subpackage, effectively solving the problem without
> dropping (semi) useful code.

But the bugs, you see, are in the files.

Yeah, okay. bdftruncate is a subpackage now.

- ajax

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list