Summary of broken packages (by owner):

berrange AT redhat.com
perl-Test-AutoBuild-darcs-1.2.2-3.fc9.noarch

ebmunson AT us.ibm.com
libhugetlbfs-test-1.1-6.fc9.ppc
libhugetlbfs-test-1.1-6.fc9.ppc64
libhugetlbfs-test-1.1-6.fc9.x86_64
lsvpd-1.6.4-1.fc9.i386
lsvpd-1.6.4-1.fc9.ppc
lsvpd-1.6.4-1.fc9.ppc64
lsvpd-1.6.4-1.fc9.x86_64

karlthered AT gmail.com
gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.cvs20060817-20.fc9.i386
gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.cvs20060817-20.fc9.ppc
gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.cvs20060817-20.fc9.ppc64
gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.cvs20060817-20.fc9.x86_64

katzj AT redhat.com
livecd-tools-017.1-1.fc9.ppc64

lxtnow AT gmail.com
gspiceui-0.9.65-2.fc9.ppc64

oliver AT linux-kernel.at
syck-php-0.61-4.3.fc9.i386
syck-php-0.61-4.3.fc9.ppc
syck-php-0.61-4.3.fc9.ppc64
syck-php-0.61-4.3.fc9.x86_64

orion AT cora.nwra.com
paraview-3.2.1-6.fc9.i386
paraview-mpi-3.2.1-6.fc9.i386

than AT redhat.com
1:qt-sqlite-4.3.5-2.fc9.i386
1:qt-sqlite-4.3.5-2.fc9.ppc
1:qt-sqlite-4.3.5-2.fc9.ppc64
1:qt-sqlite-4.3.5-2.fc9.x86_64

wart AT kobold.org
cyphesis-selinux-0.5.15-6.fc9.i386
cyphesis-selinux-0.5.15-6.fc9.ppc
cyphesis-selinux-0.5.15-6.fc9.ppc64
cyphesis-selinux-0.5.15-6.fc9.x86_64


================================================== ====================
Broken packages in fedora-9-i686:

cyphesis-selinux-0.5.15-6.fc9.i386 requires cyphesis = 0:0.5.15-6.fc9
syck-php-0.61-4.3.fc9.i386 requires php = 0:5.2.5


================================================== ====================
Broken packages in fedora-9-ppc64:

cyphesis-selinux-0.5.15-6.fc9.ppc64 requires cyphesis = 0:0.5.15-6.fc9
libhugetlbfs-test-1.1-6.fc9.ppc64 requires libhugetlbfs = 0:1.1-6.fc9
perl-Test-AutoBuild-darcs-1.2.2-3.fc9.noarch requires darcs >= 0:1.0.0
syck-php-0.61-4.3.fc9.ppc64 requires php = 0:5.2.5


================================================== ====================
Broken packages in fedora-9-ppc:

cyphesis-selinux-0.5.15-6.fc9.ppc requires cyphesis = 0:0.5.15-6.fc9
libhugetlbfs-test-1.1-6.fc9.ppc requires libhugetlbfs = 0:1.1-6.fc9
syck-php-0.61-4.3.fc9.ppc requires php = 0:5.2.5


================================================== ====================
Broken packages in fedora-9-x86_64:

cyphesis-selinux-0.5.15-6.fc9.x86_64 requires cyphesis = 0:0.5.15-6.fc9
libhugetlbfs-test-1.1-6.fc9.x86_64 requires libhugetlbfs = 0:1.1-6.fc9
paraview-3.2.1-6.fc9.i386 requires paraview-data = 0:3.2.1-6.fc9
paraview-mpi-3.2.1-6.fc9.i386 requires paraview-data = 0:3.2.1-6.fc9
syck-php-0.61-4.3.fc9.x86_64 requires php = 0:5.2.5


================================================== ====================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-9-i686:

1:qt-sqlite-4.3.5-2.fc9.i386 requires qt = 1:4.3.5-2.fc9
gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.cvs20060817-20.fc9.i386 requires gecko-libs = 0:1.9
lsvpd-1.6.4-1.fc9.i386 requires libvpd_cxx-2.0.so.1


================================================== ====================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-9-ppc:

1:qt-sqlite-4.3.5-2.fc9.ppc requires qt = 1:4.3.5-2.fc9


================================================== ====================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-9-ppc64:

1:qt-sqlite-4.3.5-2.fc9.ppc64 requires qt = 1:4.3.5-2.fc9
gspiceui-0.9.65-2.fc9.ppc64 requires gwave
gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.cvs20060817-20.fc9.ppc64 requires gecko-libs = 0:1.9
livecd-tools-017.1-1.fc9.ppc64 requires yaboot
lsvpd-1.6.4-1.fc9.ppc64 requires libvpd_cxx-2.0.so.1()(64bit)


================================================== ====================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-9-ppc:

gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.cvs20060817-20.fc9.ppc requires gecko-libs = 0:1.9
lsvpd-1.6.4-1.fc9.ppc requires libvpd_cxx-2.0.so.1


================================================== ====================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-9-x86_64:

1:qt-sqlite-4.3.5-2.fc9.x86_64 requires qt = 1:4.3.5-2.fc9
gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.cvs20060817-20.fc9.i386 requires gecko-libs = 0:1.9
gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.cvs20060817-20.fc9.x86_64 requires gecko-libs = 0:1.9
lsvpd-1.6.4-1.fc9.x86_64 requires libvpd_cxx-2.0.so.1()(64bit)

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Hi,

This package has no more active upstream for almost 2 years and is now
too broken to be maintained in Package collection.
I am looking for removing it from repositories.

Best regards.
H.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 09:17 +0200, H. Guémar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This package has no more active upstream for almost 2 years and is now
> too broken to be maintained in Package collection.
> I am looking for removing it from repositories.
Once a package is in released versions of Fedora, there is no easy way
(actually there is no proper way) to withdraw a package.

All you can do is to request removal from future releases of Fedora,
i.e. you can request package removal for FC10, but you can not avoid to
continue maintaining a package once it has been release.

Ralf



--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@gmail.com> wrote:

Summary of broken packages (by owner):



* *berrange AT redhat.com

* * * *perl-Test-AutoBuild-darcs-1.2.2-3.fc9.noarch



* *ebmunson AT us.ibm.com

* * * *libhugetlbfs-test-1.1-6.fc9.ppc

* * * *libhugetlbfs-test-1.1-6.fc9.ppc64

* * * *libhugetlbfs-test-1.1-6.fc9.x86_64

* * * *lsvpd-1.6.4-1.fc9.i386

* * * *lsvpd-1.6.4-1.fc9.ppc

* * * *lsvpd-1.6.4-1.fc9.ppc64

* * * *lsvpd-1.6.4-1.fc9.x86_64



* *karlthered AT gmail.com

* * * *gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.cvs20060817-20.fc9.i386

* * * *gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.cvs20060817-20.fc9.ppc

* * * *gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.cvs20060817-20.fc9.ppc64

* * * *gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.cvs20060817-20.fc9.x86_64



* *katzj AT redhat.com

* * * *livecd-tools-017.1-1.fc9.ppc64



* *lxtnow AT gmail.com

* * * *gspiceui-0.9.65-2.fc9.ppc64
This one has already been fixed in release *-3.fc9
*


--
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien

GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Michael Schwendt wrote:
| Summary of broken packages (by owner):
|
| ebmunson AT us.ibm.com
| lsvpd-1.6.4-1.fc9.i386
| lsvpd-1.6.4-1.fc9.ppc
| lsvpd-1.6.4-1.fc9.ppc64
| lsvpd-1.6.4-1.fc9.x86_64
|

These are caused by a bug I reported about a month and a half ago, libvpd's
library numbers got bumped down in the 2.0.2 release.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452851

There's been no action on it since then; I'm not sure whether it should be
against lsvpd, which would just need a rebuild with the new library number, or
to get libvpd's library number back where it was (assuming it's binary compatible).

- --
J. Randall Owens | http://www.ghiapet.net/
ProofReading Markup Language | http://prml.sourceforge.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkicKwYACgkQdGy7nCl1Vp9aowCgqJ7vMZM/5mYjfJveglPwIJ6B
DMMAnj/e4Y1JWli3lWeQUNfN8JpTJsjq
=8uqQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Thanks for your input.
Tonight, it will be removed from devel and i'll see what I can do for
previous release.

2008/8/8 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@freenet.de>:
> On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 09:17 +0200, H. Guémar wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This package has no more active upstream for almost 2 years and is now
>> too broken to be maintained in Package collection.
>> I am looking for removing it from repositories.
> Once a package is in released versions of Fedora, there is no easy way
> (actually there is no proper way) to withdraw a package.
>
> All you can do is to request removal from future releases of Fedora,
> i.e. you can request package removal for FC10, but you can not avoid to
> continue maintaining a package once it has been release.
>
> Ralf
>
>
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

On Fri, 08 Aug 2008 04:16:28 -0700, J. Randall Owens wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> | Summary of broken packages (by owner):
> |
> | ebmunson AT us.ibm.com
> | lsvpd-1.6.4-1.fc9.i386
> | lsvpd-1.6.4-1.fc9.ppc
> | lsvpd-1.6.4-1.fc9.ppc64
> | lsvpd-1.6.4-1.fc9.x86_64
> |
>
> These are caused by a bug I reported about a month and a half ago, libvpd's
> library numbers got bumped down in the 2.0.2 release.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452851
>
> There's been no action on it since then;

The corresponding update in bodhi was this:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-4187

Effectively, this soname problem has been reported in two places.

> I'm not sure whether it should be
> against lsvpd, which would just need a rebuild with the new library number, or
> to get libvpd's library number back where it was (assuming it's binary compatible).
>

libvpd 2.0.0 had major version 0, libvpd 2.0.1 bumped to major version 1,
then they reverted that in 2.0.2. Meanwhile 2.0.3 is available and stays
at major version 0.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

H. Guémar wrote:

Thanks for your input.
Tonight, it will be removed from devel and i'll see what I can do for
previous release.

Remember to email rel-eng@fedoraproject.org about the removal. They
need to block the package in koji in addition to you removing the files
from cvs. (And marking it with a dead.package file)


-Toshio

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

On Friday 08 August 2008 09:00:33 Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Your following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
>
> package: 1:qt-sqlite-4.3.5-2.fc9.i386 from fedora-updates-9-i686
> unresolved deps:
> qt = 1:4.3.5-2.fc9
>
> package: 1:qt-sqlite-4.3.5-2.fc9.ppc from fedora-updates-9-ppc
> unresolved deps:
> qt = 1:4.3.5-2.fc9
>
> package: 1:qt-sqlite-4.3.5-2.fc9.ppc64 from fedora-updates-9-ppc64
> unresolved deps:
> qt = 1:4.3.5-2.fc9
>
> package: 1:qt-sqlite-4.3.5-2.fc9.x86_64 from fedora-updates-9-x86_64
> unresolved deps:
> qt = 1:4.3.5-2.fc9

it's fixed in qt-4.4.1 which will be pushed in f9-update soon. Thanks for your
infos


Than

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list