FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 08-02-2008, 11:50 AM
Bojan Smojver
 
Default Anyone building 2.6.26.x for F9?

I see 2.6.25.14 has been built today in Koji. Is anyone working on
putting 2.6.26.x in action on F9?

--
Bojan

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 08-02-2008, 12:30 PM
Josh Boyer
 
Default Anyone building 2.6.26.x for F9?

On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 21:50 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> I see 2.6.25.14 has been built today in Koji. Is anyone working on
> putting 2.6.26.x in action on F9?

Yes, Chuck is. However, the first -stable release for 2.6.26.1 had over
60 patches in it's queue. Also, rawhide never really released any form
of .26 kernel, as it went right to .27 git snapshots. So it's a bit of
an unknown.

josh

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 08-02-2008, 03:52 PM
Bruno Wolff III
 
Default Anyone building 2.6.26.x for F9?

On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 08:30:47 -0400,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 21:50 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> > I see 2.6.25.14 has been built today in Koji. Is anyone working on
> > putting 2.6.26.x in action on F9?
>
> Yes, Chuck is. However, the first -stable release for 2.6.26.1 had over
> 60 patches in it's queue. Also, rawhide never really released any form
> of .26 kernel, as it went right to .27 git snapshots. So it's a bit of
> an unknown.

Wouldn't it make more sense to go from .25 to .27 and skip .26 in that case?

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 08-02-2008, 04:10 PM
drago01
 
Default Anyone building 2.6.26.x for F9?

On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 08:30:47 -0400,
> Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 21:50 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
>> > I see 2.6.25.14 has been built today in Koji. Is anyone working on
>> > putting 2.6.26.x in action on F9?
>>
>> Yes, Chuck is. However, the first -stable release for 2.6.26.1 had over
>> 60 patches in it's queue. Also, rawhide never really released any form
>> of .26 kernel, as it went right to .27 git snapshots. So it's a bit of
>> an unknown.
>
> Wouldn't it make more sense to go from .25 to .27 and skip .26 in that case?

no, .27 is not released yet and will take some time until its released
and tested.
pushing 2.6.26.1 to updates-testing is the right thing to do.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 08-02-2008, 05:37 PM
Itamar - IspBrasil
 
Default Anyone building 2.6.26.x for F9?

I belive you can install 2.6.27 from F10 into F9

yum -y install kernel --enablerepo=development

Bojan Smojver wrote:

I see 2.6.25.14 has been built today in Koji. Is anyone working on
putting 2.6.26.x in action on F9?





--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 08-02-2008, 06:39 PM
Bruno Wolff III
 
Default Anyone building 2.6.26.x for F9?

On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 18:10:35 +0200,
drago01 <drago01@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> no, .27 is not released yet and will take some time until its released
> and tested.
> pushing 2.6.26.1 to updates-testing is the right thing to do.

Fedora people are already working on getting .27 whipped into shape. Even if
.26 was pushed to F9 it would soon be supplmented by .27. So what is so
compelling about .26 that it is worth taking effort away from .27 development,
when it very likely wouldn't be used very long in Fedora?

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 08-02-2008, 06:43 PM
drago01
 
Default Anyone building 2.6.26.x for F9?

On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 18:10:35 +0200,
> drago01 <drago01@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> no, .27 is not released yet and will take some time until its released
>> and tested.
>> pushing 2.6.26.1 to updates-testing is the right thing to do.
>
> Fedora people are already working on getting .27 whipped into shape. Even if
> .26 was pushed to F9 it would soon be supplmented by .27. So what is so
> compelling about .26 that it is worth taking effort away from .27 development,
> when it very likely wouldn't be used very long in Fedora?
>

Well it will be used as long as other kernel release, we usually don't
switch to new kernels on day 0.
And the same "getting whipped into shape" was done for 2.6.26 too (in
rawhide and now upstream with 2.6.26.1)

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 08-04-2008, 03:22 PM
Alexandre Oliva
 
Default Anyone building 2.6.26.x for F9?

On Aug 2, 2008, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> wrote:

> Also, rawhide never really released any form of .26 kernel, as it
> went right to .27 git snapshots.

I don't remember whether kernel-2.6.26-138.fc10 made it to rawhide,
but I know it was built, and I happen to have preserved the
corresponding linux-libre build in the linux-libre rawhide repository
at http://fsfla.org/download/linux-libre/freed-ora/devel/

--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
FSFLA Board Member °Sť Libre! => http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 08-04-2008, 07:57 PM
Steven Pritchard
 
Default Anyone building 2.6.26.x for F9?

On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 01:39:41PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Fedora people are already working on getting .27 whipped into shape. Even if
> .26 was pushed to F9 it would soon be supplmented by .27. So what is so
> compelling about .26 that it is worth taking effort away from .27 development,
> when it very likely wouldn't be used very long in Fedora?

Working sound on a ThinkPad X300. :-)

Steve
--
Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc.
Email: steve@kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/
Phone: (618)624-4440 Mobile: (618)567-7320

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 10:34 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org