FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 07-30-2008, 06:11 PM
Bastien Nocera
 
Default Does your app use LIRC?

If your app uses liblirc_client, it would be nice if you could follow
the instructions, and the two examples at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BetterLIRCSupport#User_Experience

to make your application work out-of-the-box in Fedora 10.

Elisa, Totem and Rhythmbox are already fixed.

I'd have had a nice list using repoquery, but it just seems to hang
there doing nothing (and then gives me useless answers, might just be
me...).

Let me know if you have any questions about the setup.

Cheers



--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 07-31-2008, 12:48 PM
"Paulo Cavalcanti"
 
Default Does your app use LIRC?

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Bastien Nocera <bnocera@redhat.com> wrote:

If your app uses liblirc_client, it would be nice if you could follow

the instructions, and the two examples at:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BetterLIRCSupport#User_Experience



to make your application work out-of-the-box in Fedora 10.



Elisa, Totem and Rhythmbox are already fixed.



I'd have had a nice list using repoquery, but it just seems to hang

there doing nothing (and then gives me useless answers, might just be

me...).



Let me know if you have any questions about the setup.




Hi,

I tried it on F8.
I had to upgrade

PolicyKit-0.8-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm
PolicyKit-devel-0.8-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm
PolicyKit-docs-0.8-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm
PolicyKit-gnome-0.8-4.fc8.x86_64.rpm

PolicyKit-gnome-demo-0.8-4.fc8.x86_64.rpm
PolicyKit-gnome-devel-0.8-4.fc8.x86_64.rpm
PolicyKit-gnome-libs-0.8-4.fc8.x86_64.rpm

before installing
gnome-lirc-properties-0.2.5-1.fc8.noarch.rpm


I also used lirc from CVS (the newest version I could get).

When I rebooted and run /usr/bin/gnome-lirc-properties, I got:

...............

WARNING:root:/usr/share/doc/lirc-0.8.4/remotes/: Remote DVICO_MCE listed twice in dvico/lircd.conf.fusionHDTV and dvico/lircd.conf.fusionHDTV.

WARNING:root:/usr/share/doc/lirc-0.8.4/remotes/: Remote PVR2000 listed twice in leadtek/lircd.conf.PVR2000 and leadtek/lircd.conf.PVR2000.
WARNING:root:/usr/share/doc/lirc-0.8.4/remotes/: Remote BESTBUY listed twice in bestbuy/lircd.conf.bestbuy2 and bestbuy/lircd.conf.bestbuy.


Traceback (most recent call last):
* File "/usr/bin/gnome-lirc-properties", line 27, in <module>
*** gnome_lirc_properties.run(sys.argv[1:], datadir)
* File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gnome_lirc_properties/__init__.py", line 57, in run

*** return ui.RemoteControlProperties(gtk.glade.XML(ui_filena me)).run()
* File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gnome_lirc_properties/ui/RemoteControlProperties.py", line 55, in __init__
*** self.__restore_hardware_settings()

* File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gnome_lirc_properties/ui/RemoteControlProperties.py", line 218, in __restore_hardware_settings
*** settings = lirc.HardwareConfParser(config.LIRC_HARDWARE_CONF)
* File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gnome_lirc_properties/lirc.py", line 950, in __init__

*** key, value = tokens
ValueError: too many values to unpack

Any clue?

--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 08-01-2008, 11:22 AM
"Paulo Cavalcanti"
 
Default Does your app use LIRC?

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti <promac@gmail.com> wrote:



On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Bastien Nocera <bnocera@redhat.com> wrote:


If your app uses liblirc_client, it would be nice if you could follow

the instructions, and the two examples at:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BetterLIRCSupport#User_Experience



to make your application work out-of-the-box in Fedora 10.



Elisa, Totem and Rhythmbox are already fixed.



I'd have had a nice list using repoquery, but it just seems to hang

there doing nothing (and then gives me useless answers, might just be

me...).



Let me know if you have any questions about the setup.




Hi,

I tried it on F8.
I had to upgrade

PolicyKit-0.8-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm
PolicyKit-devel-0.8-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm
PolicyKit-docs-0.8-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm
PolicyKit-gnome-0.8-4.fc8.x86_64.rpm


PolicyKit-gnome-demo-0.8-4.fc8.x86_64.rpm
PolicyKit-gnome-devel-0.8-4.fc8.x86_64.rpm
PolicyKit-gnome-libs-0.8-4.fc8.x86_64.rpm

before installing
gnome-lirc-properties-0.2.5-1.fc8.noarch.rpm



I also used lirc from CVS (the newest version I could get).

When I rebooted and run /usr/bin/gnome-lirc-properties, I got:

...............

WARNING:root:/usr/share/doc/lirc-0.8.4/remotes/: Remote DVICO_MCE listed twice in dvico/lircd.conf.fusionHDTV and dvico/lircd.conf.fusionHDTV.


WARNING:root:/usr/share/doc/lirc-0.8.4/remotes/: Remote PVR2000 listed twice in leadtek/lircd.conf.PVR2000 and leadtek/lircd.conf.PVR2000.
WARNING:root:/usr/share/doc/lirc-0.8.4/remotes/: Remote BESTBUY listed twice in bestbuy/lircd.conf.bestbuy2 and bestbuy/lircd.conf.bestbuy.



Traceback (most recent call last):
* File "/usr/bin/gnome-lirc-properties", line 27, in <module>
*** gnome_lirc_properties.run(sys.argv[1:], datadir)
* File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gnome_lirc_properties/__init__.py", line 57, in run


*** return ui.RemoteControlProperties(gtk.glade.XML(ui_filena me)).run()
* File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gnome_lirc_properties/ui/RemoteControlProperties.py", line 55, in __init__
*** self.__restore_hardware_settings()


* File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gnome_lirc_properties/ui/RemoteControlProperties.py", line 218, in __restore_hardware_settings
*** settings = lirc.HardwareConfParser(config.LIRC_HARDWARE_CONF)
* File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gnome_lirc_properties/lirc.py", line 950, in __init__


*** key, value = tokens
ValueError: too many values to unpack

Any clue?


The problem is that it is not able to parse my configuration file in /etc/sysconfig:

LIRCD_OPTIONS="-H dev/input --device name='bttv IR (card=70)'"


Note that this is a valid OPTION. It has been working with my remote for a long time ...
*

--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 08-01-2008, 01:59 PM
"Paulo Cavalcanti"
 
Default Does your app use LIRC?

On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti <promac@gmail.com> wrote:



On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti <promac@gmail.com> wrote:




On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Bastien Nocera <bnocera@redhat.com> wrote:


If your app uses liblirc_client, it would be nice if you could follow

the instructions, and the two examples at:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BetterLIRCSupport#User_Experience



to make your application work out-of-the-box in Fedora 10.



Elisa, Totem and Rhythmbox are already fixed.



I'd have had a nice list using repoquery, but it just seems to hang

there doing nothing (and then gives me useless answers, might just be

me...).



Let me know if you have any questions about the setup.




Hi,

I tried it on F8.
I had to upgrade

PolicyKit-0.8-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm
PolicyKit-devel-0.8-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm
PolicyKit-docs-0.8-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm
PolicyKit-gnome-0.8-4.fc8.x86_64.rpm



PolicyKit-gnome-demo-0.8-4.fc8.x86_64.rpm
PolicyKit-gnome-devel-0.8-4.fc8.x86_64.rpm
PolicyKit-gnome-libs-0.8-4.fc8.x86_64.rpm

before installing
gnome-lirc-properties-0.2.5-1.fc8.noarch.rpm




I also used lirc from CVS (the newest version I could get).

When I rebooted and run /usr/bin/gnome-lirc-properties, I got:

...............

WARNING:root:/usr/share/doc/lirc-0.8.4/remotes/: Remote DVICO_MCE listed twice in dvico/lircd.conf.fusionHDTV and dvico/lircd.conf.fusionHDTV.



WARNING:root:/usr/share/doc/lirc-0.8.4/remotes/: Remote PVR2000 listed twice in leadtek/lircd.conf.PVR2000 and leadtek/lircd.conf.PVR2000.
WARNING:root:/usr/share/doc/lirc-0.8.4/remotes/: Remote BESTBUY listed twice in bestbuy/lircd.conf.bestbuy2 and bestbuy/lircd.conf.bestbuy.




Traceback (most recent call last):
* File "/usr/bin/gnome-lirc-properties", line 27, in <module>
*** gnome_lirc_properties.run(sys.argv[1:], datadir)
* File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gnome_lirc_properties/__init__.py", line 57, in run



*** return ui.RemoteControlProperties(gtk.glade.XML(ui_filena me)).run()
* File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gnome_lirc_properties/ui/RemoteControlProperties.py", line 55, in __init__
*** self.__restore_hardware_settings()



* File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gnome_lirc_properties/ui/RemoteControlProperties.py", line 218, in __restore_hardware_settings
*** settings = lirc.HardwareConfParser(config.LIRC_HARDWARE_CONF)
* File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gnome_lirc_properties/lirc.py", line 950, in __init__



*** key, value = tokens
ValueError: too many values to unpack

Any clue?


The problem is that it is not able to parse my configuration file in /etc/sysconfig:


LIRCD_OPTIONS="-H dev/input --device name='bttv IR (card=70)'"


Note that this is a valid OPTION. It has been working with my remote for a long time ...
*




Upgrading to version 0.8.3 and using PolicyKit 0.9.2 from F10 made it work on F8.


However, it will take a long time until all remote codes out there are converted
to the standard lirc namespace, so the applications work out of the box.

Some keys do not even have a natural correspondence on my remote,

such as "snapshot", "scan", "loop", etc ... I would have to choose another name for them
from the options in the namespace.

But the idea is interesting. I like standards.


--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 08-03-2008, 07:16 PM
Jarod Wilson
 
Default Does your app use LIRC?

On Wednesday 30 July 2008 14:11:37 Bastien Nocera wrote:
> If your app uses liblirc_client, it would be nice if you could follow
> the instructions, and the two examples at:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BetterLIRCSupport#User_Experience
>
> to make your application work out-of-the-box in Fedora 10.

Nb: the lirc driver patch is currently disabled in the latest rawhide kernels
(doesn't build w/the latest pre-2.6.27 bits). Been on vacation without much in
the way of internet access the past week, but I'll try to get that fixed up
this week...

--
Jarod Wilson
jwilson@redhat.com

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 08-04-2008, 01:39 PM
Jarod Wilson
 
Default Does your app use LIRC?

Jarod Wilson wrote:

On Wednesday 30 July 2008 14:11:37 Bastien Nocera wrote:

If your app uses liblirc_client, it would be nice if you could follow
the instructions, and the two examples at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BetterLIRCSupport#User_Experience

to make your application work out-of-the-box in Fedora 10.


Nb: the lirc driver patch is currently disabled in the latest rawhide kernels
(doesn't build w/the latest pre-2.6.27 bits). Been on vacation without much in
the way of internet access the past week, but I'll try to get that fixed up
this week...


Trivial fix, should be all set in kernel-2.6.27-0.216.rc1.git4.fc10 and later.


--
Jarod Wilson
jwilson@redhat.com

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 08-08-2008, 04:56 PM
Nicolas Mailhot
 
Default Does your app use LIRC?

On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 09:39 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 July 2008 14:11:37 Bastien Nocera wrote:
> >> If your app uses liblirc_client, it would be nice if you could follow
> >> the instructions, and the two examples at:
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BetterLIRCSupport#User_Experience
> >>
> >> to make your application work out-of-the-box in Fedora 10.
> >
> > Nb: the lirc driver patch is currently disabled in the latest rawhide kernels
> > (doesn't build w/the latest pre-2.6.27 bits). Been on vacation without much in
> > the way of internet access the past week, but I'll try to get that fixed up
> > this week...
>
> Trivial fix, should be all set in kernel-2.6.27-0.216.rc1.git4.fc10 and later.

Wasn't this supposed to be upstreamed? Or did a kernel marge window come
and pass again with no merge?

--
Nicolas Mailhot
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 08-08-2008, 06:16 PM
Jarod Wilson
 
Default Does your app use LIRC?

On Friday 08 August 2008 12:56:31 Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 09:39 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 30 July 2008 14:11:37 Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > >> If your app uses liblirc_client, it would be nice if you could follow
> > >> the instructions, and the two examples at:
> > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BetterLIRCSupport#User_Experie
> > >>nce
> > >>
> > >> to make your application work out-of-the-box in Fedora 10.
> > >
> > > Nb: the lirc driver patch is currently disabled in the latest rawhide
> > > kernels (doesn't build w/the latest pre-2.6.27 bits). Been on vacation
> > > without much in the way of internet access the past week, but I'll try
> > > to get that fixed up this week...
> >
> > Trivial fix, should be all set in kernel-2.6.27-0.216.rc1.git4.fc10 and
> > later.
>
> Wasn't this supposed to be upstreamed? Or did a kernel marge window come
> and pass again with no merge?

I suck. And/or simply haven't had enough time to complete the necessary work
to get it upstream. LIRC has zip to do with $dayjob, so my work on it is
limited to personal free time, which there hasn't been much of lately.

--
Jarod Wilson
jwilson@redhat.com

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org