2008/7/19 Paul <paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk>:
> To me, rawhide is there for exactly this purpose - a testing ground to
> see how much is broken before pushing to stable.


If that is how you view rawhide... what is your interpretation as to
the purpose of updates-testing?

-jef

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 23:12 +0200, David Nielsen wrote:


> Then how about: what we ship right now in F9 is a preview release to
> this update, having the same Mono throughout our releases is easier to
> maintain.. this is aside the bugfixes and memory usage/performance
> enhancements that come with Mono 2.0, all things that will in the end
> benefit Fedora and our users. Also pushing newer versions of the stack
> will enable us to support applications more widely across the stack.

Ah! I wasn't aware that that mono-1.9.x was actually a preview of Mono
2.0. Indeed, It looks like it provides all the same stuff and doesn't
involve an soname bump, either. That's totally reasonable, then - at
least for F9. I've got no objections there. Thanks for correcting me.

-w
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Den 18. jul. 2008 12.00 skrev Paul <paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk>:

Hi,



I'm expecting the next beta of Mono to hit the servers today. There are

quite a few changes since 1.9.1-2, so please be aware that things may be

broken and need rebuilding.



Sorry about that. In the words of the good book "Normal service will be

resumed just as soon as we know what normal is anyway"



Also, please note that as of Mono 2.0, the licence changes to MIT rather

that the mix and match that it currently is. This is happening right

across the mono family as of version 2 (though probably not for the

likes of gtk-sharp2 and gnome-sharp)
Whatever happened to this?


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

2008/7/30 David Nielsen <gnomeuser@gmail.com>:
>
>
> Den 18. jul. 2008 12.00 skrev Paul <paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm expecting the next beta of Mono to hit the servers today. There are
>> quite a few changes since 1.9.1-2, so please be aware that things may be
>> broken and need rebuilding.
>>
>> Sorry about that. In the words of the good book "Normal service will be
>> resumed just as soon as we know what normal is anyway"
>>
>> Also, please note that as of Mono 2.0, the licence changes to MIT rather
>> that the mix and match that it currently is. This is happening right
>> across the mono family as of version 2 (though probably not for the
>> likes of gtk-sharp2 and gnome-sharp)
>
> Whatever happened to this?

afaik mono-2.0 is not released yet...

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

>>> I'm expecting the next beta of Mono to hit the servers today. There are
>>> quite a few changes since 1.9.1-2, so please be aware that things may be
>>> broken and need rebuilding.
>>>
>>> Sorry about that. In the words of the good book "Normal service will be
>>> resumed just as soon as we know what normal is anyway"
>>>
>>> Also, please note that as of Mono 2.0, the licence changes to MIT rather
>>> that the mix and match that it currently is. This is happening right
>>> across the mono family as of version 2 (though probably not for the
>>> likes of gtk-sharp2 and gnome-sharp)
>>
>> Whatever happened to this?
>
> afaik mono-2.0 is not released yet...

No but the first preview apparently hit yesterday according Miguel's blog

http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2008/Aug-01.html

Peter

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list