FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

» Linux Archive
Home
New Posts
Search
FAQ


Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 07-11-2008, 09:57 PM
"Jeff Spaleta"
 
Default Attention Spin Maintainers

On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> wrote:
> We (rel-eng) haven't designated any of the additional spins officially
> yet.

Whatever you end up calling them... what Jesse described as the status
of the Desktop and KDE images is exactly what the suggested permanent
designation was meant to be used for.

-jef"A permanent spin by any other name...smells as sweet?"spaleta

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 07-12-2008, 01:17 PM
Jeroen van Meeuwen
 
Default Attention Spin Maintainers

Rex Dieter wrote:

Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:


Spin Maintainers, may I please have your attention.

To be included in the Fedora 10 release cycle, you'll need a Feature
page in category ProposedFeature (and change that to the
ProposedFeatureF10 category when you feel the Spin Concept is ready for
actual inclusion). This page should be ready (eg. prepared) before the
Alpha freeze.


All or just new spins (ie, where to Desktop, KDE, and other existing ones
fall)?



It should be done for all spins to-be included in the next release.
Obviously, for the recurring spins such as Gnome and KDE, the page will
just need to change category between development cycles.


To show you how this is not at all too much overhead for you as a
maintainer / initiator of the Spin Concept... The more you write on your
wiki page about the spin, the easier the websites-team will be able to
-in the future- create you a neat page for the specific spin on spins.fp.o


Kind regards,

Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 07-12-2008, 01:29 PM
Jeroen van Meeuwen
 
Default Attention Spin Maintainers

Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
It should be done for all spins to-be included in the next release.
Obviously, for the recurring spins such as Gnome and KDE, the page will
just need to change category between development cycles.


To show you how this is not at all too much overhead for you as a
maintainer / initiator of the Spin Concept... The more you write on your
wiki page about the spin, the easier the websites-team will be able to
-in the future- create you a neat page for the specific spin on spins.fp.o




Note to self... read the entire thread before replying.

If it's in spin-kickstarts, and going to end up on spins.fp.o, it needs
to have a Feature page IMHO.


Whether we all know to ignore whatever is on the KDE spin feature page,
or whether we all get a chance to see how Rex and Sebastian are doing,
track motivations for changes they make and where they're moving in
general, or just because I can then search the wiki for all Spin Wiki
Feature Pages, maintainers, progress, etc...


I didn't even mention the advantages of treating two of the same things
like if they really were the same, within the Feature process...


Kind regards,

Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 01:22 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org