Fedora x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-07-03
Fedora Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for x86_64
Based on the tree as of Thu Jul 3 2008.
While I'm waiting on a bugzilla fix, I don't have all bugzilla numbers
for existing FTBFS bugs.
Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
Total packages: 5873
Number failed to build: 260
Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 38
Leaving: 222
(there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a package)
Looking into libapreq2. The other two were already fixed.
--
Bojan
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
07-07-2008, 10:31 PM
Bojan Smojver
Fedora x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-07-03
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 08:10 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> Looking into libapreq2.
OK, fixed too.
If anyone has broken packages related to apr-util going 1.3.x, it may be
due to what apu-1-config --libs returns, which contains LDAP libraries
by default. Try using apu-1-config --avoid-ldap --libs instead (order of
options is important).
--
Bojan
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
07-07-2008, 10:33 PM
Kevin Kofler
Fedora x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-07-03
Bojan Smojver <bojan <at> rexursive.com> writes:
> If anyone has broken packages related to apr-util going 1.3.x, it may be
> due to what apu-1-config --libs returns, which contains LDAP libraries
> by default. Try using apu-1-config --avoid-ldap --libs instead (order of
> options is important).
I ran into the same thing with KDevelop (it builds a kioslave for svn), I just
added a BR openldap-devel. IMHO apr-devel should Require openldap-devel.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
07-07-2008, 10:37 PM
Kevin Kofler
Fedora x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-07-03
Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch <at> dell.com> writes:
> kdevelop-3.5.2-2.fc10 (build/make) than,rdieter,kkofler,ltinkl
Fixed. apr-devel has a -lldap in its config stuff, but is missing a dependency
on openldap-devel, so I added that to kdevelop for now.
Fixed. This one is entirely my fault, the .pro file (which I wrote) tries to
autodetect _kde4_appsdir and fails at it (because of a recent kdelibs bugfix),
for now I'm explicitly setting it from the specfile.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
07-07-2008, 11:18 PM
Michael Schwendt
Fedora x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-07-03
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 16:34:43 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> Fedora Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for x86_64
> Based on the tree as of Thu Jul 3 2008.
> Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
There's some external breakage somewhere. In libSAD, whatever that is.
It is not a direct dependency of audacious-plugin-fc. libSAD ought not
(better MUST NOT) include a header with the name "config.h" in a public
API:
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
07-07-2008, 11:23 PM
Bojan Smojver
Fedora x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-07-03
Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler <at> chello.at> writes:
> I ran into the same thing with KDevelop (it builds a kioslave for svn), I just
> added a BR openldap-devel. IMHO apr-devel should Require openldap-devel.
New apr-util should not require openldap-devel, as long as you are not using
LDAP APIs directly.
LDAP libraries are returned by apu-1-config --libs to obey by project's
versioning rules (as noted by Joe Orton). However, the new option --avoid-ldap
should be used (before --libs) in order to get actually required libraries for
the builds that load LDAP support on request (i.e. as DSO).
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
07-08-2008, 08:01 AM
Joe Orton
Fedora x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-07-03
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 08:31:05AM +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 08:10 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
>
> > Looking into libapreq2.
>
> OK, fixed too.
>
> If anyone has broken packages related to apr-util going 1.3.x, it may be
> due to what apu-1-config --libs returns, which contains LDAP libraries
> by default. Try using apu-1-config --avoid-ldap --libs instead (order of
> options is important).
apr-util-devel dropped the "Requires: openldap-devel" - this is still
needed for the same source compat problems as upstream. I've restored
this and am building -5. Individual packages *can* switch to using
--avoid-ldap but builds should not be broken without that.
joe
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
07-08-2008, 08:12 AM
Bojan Smojver
Fedora x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-07-03
Joe Orton <jorton <at> redhat.com> writes:
> apr-util-devel dropped the "Requires: openldap-devel" - this is still
> needed for the same source compat problems as upstream.
Right, I missed that bit :-(
> Individual packages *can* switch to using
> --avoid-ldap but builds should not be broken without that.
libapreq2 trunk and 2_10 have had --avoid-ldap committed today, for APU that has
that option.
--
Bojan
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
07-08-2008, 09:56 PM
"Tom "spot" Callaway"
Fedora x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-07-03
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:34 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> spot: R-RScaLAPACK,blacs,scalapack,xsupplicant
Folks playing along at home should note the following:
- lam moved its libraries and headers to a new location
- iwlib.h conflicts with a lot of other kernel headers now (but is much
more self sufficient in userspace)
~spot
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list