FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 07-04-2008, 09:56 AM
Nicolas Mailhot
 
Default Fonts packaging amendment

Hi,

I'm proposing the following amendment:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Packaging_font_bundles

to our fonts packaging policy:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FontsPolicy
(official page, broken by the wiki migration)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_packaging_policy
(unofficial cleaned-up font page ; I hope someone will the right
accesses picks it up)

Nothing earth-shattering, just a write-up of our current unwritten rules

Regards,

--
Nicolas Mailhot
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 07-04-2008, 09:56 AM
Nicolas Mailhot
 
Default Fonts packaging amendment

Hi,

I'm proposing the following amendment:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Packaging_font_bundles

to our fonts packaging policy:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FontsPolicy
(official page, broken by the wiki migration)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_packaging_policy
(unofficial cleaned-up font page ; I hope someone will the right
accesses picks it up)

Nothing earth-shattering, just a write-up of our current unwritten rules

Regards,

--
Nicolas Mailhot
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
 
Old 07-07-2008, 01:51 PM
Rex Dieter
 
Default Fonts packaging amendment

Nicolas Mailhot wrote:

> I'm proposing the following amendment:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Packaging_font_bundles

shrug, putting common sense into policy usually rubs me the wrong way, but
no objections.

-- Rex

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
 
Old 07-07-2008, 07:20 PM
"Nicolas Mailhot"
 
Default Fonts packaging amendment

Le Lun 7 juillet 2008 15:51, Rex Dieter a écrit :
>
> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
>> I'm proposing the following amendment:
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Packaging_font_bundles
>
> shrug, putting common sense into policy usually rubs me the wrong way,
> but no objections.

Well, I had actual would be packagers ask this, and pointing to
guidelines is easier than trying to convince them they're doing
something stupid.

--
Nicolas Mailhot

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
 
Old 07-07-2008, 07:43 PM
"Nicolas Mailhot"
 
Default Fonts packaging amendment

BTW this point was raised in a review lately
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148#c9

I don't care about it much, and the review went nowhere, but if
someone cares...

--
Nicolas Mailhot

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
 
Old 07-08-2008, 12:47 AM
Jens Petersen
 
Default Fonts packaging amendment

On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 11:56:26 +0200
Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net> wrote:

> I'm proposing the following amendment:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Packaging_font_bundles

It looks good to me and makes sense: there is plenty of confusion
in this area for fonts.

Jens

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:22 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org