FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 06-20-2008, 06:51 AM
Michel Salim
 
Default xulrunner and silent breakage of downstream apps

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The recent push of xulrunner-1.9 and Firefox 3 broke Miro and devhelp
(https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/pending/devhelp-0.19.1-2.fc9)
again.

Is there a way to declare these kinds of dependencies that we are not
using right now? Should Miro and devhelp specifically require xulrunner
= %{version}-%{release} -- or perhaps a more administrative solution;
block a non-security release of xulrunner for at least one day and
automatically notify the maintainers of its dependents?

Thanks,

- --
Michel Salim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkhbU2YACgkQWt0J3fd+7ZAzWwCghYaOeH4ezM yTa5r3bsktUWxV
9boAn1wzfFY/v0k8bTJeEn1masgkQC7F
=Pt25
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 06-20-2008, 08:23 AM
Denis Leroy
 
Default xulrunner and silent breakage of downstream apps

Michel Salim wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The recent push of xulrunner-1.9 and Firefox 3 broke Miro and devhelp
(https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/pending/devhelp-0.19.1-2.fc9)
again.

Is there a way to declare these kinds of dependencies that we are not
using right now? Should Miro and devhelp specifically require xulrunner
= %{version}-%{release} -- or perhaps a more administrative solution;
block a non-security release of xulrunner for at least one day and
automatically notify the maintainers of its dependents?


It broke galeon as well, but this has to be a bug in xulrunner which
didn't maintain binary compatibility when it was supposed to, no ?


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 01:24 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org