* Dr Andrew John Hughes <email@example.com> [2012-01-11 15:16]:
> On 18:01 Tue 10 Jan , Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have spent the last few days (on and off) trying to gather a list of
> > packages that need to be updated for Java 7 in rawhide. I have
> > identified 31 packages that fail to build (almost all trivial/easy to
> > fix), and some more that hard code a Java 6 requirement.
> > I have created a wiki page listing all the packages, the issues, and
> > how to fix them:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Java7_Package_Rebuild_Status
> > It'd be great if everyone could please volunteer to fix some of them. If
> > you have ProvenPackager status and have time, please add your name to
> > the list of ProvenPackagers on that page so that those without access
> > can send you their fixes.
> > I will be applying for ProvenPackager status myself and will add my name
> > to that list if/when I get it.
> > Thanks,
> > Deepak
> > --
> > java-devel mailing list
> > firstname.lastname@example.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
> Any idea why gcj is on the BuildRequires update list? It seems surprising that
> it needs java-1.6.0-openjdk when it's usually used to build OpenJDK.
From the spec file at
* Thu Apr 3 2008 Thomas Fitzsimmons <email@example.com> - 22.214.171.124-21
- Require java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel for javadoc instead of sinjdoc.
> Free Java Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
> PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
> Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
java-devel mailing list