Trouble building jmock 2.5.1
I'm looking at packaging jmock 2.5.1. Package is here:
http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/jmock-2.5.1-1.fc15.src.rpm Build log: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/rpmbuild.log Error is during the tests: [junit] Testcase: testCanMockTypesFromADynamicClassLoader(org.jmock. test.unit.lib.JavaReflectionImposteriserTests): Caused an ERROR [junit] Invalid superclass index 0 in class file $UniqueTypeName$ [junit] java.lang.ClassFormatError: Invalid superclass index 0 in class file $UniqueTypeName$ [junit] at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method) [junit] at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java :634) [junit] at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java :480) [junit] at org.jmock.test.unit.support.SyntheticEmptyInterfac eClassLoader.synthesiseInterface(SyntheticEmptyInt erfaceClassLoader.java:43) [junit] at org.jmock.test.unit.support.SyntheticEmptyInterfac eClassLoader.findClass(SyntheticEmptyInterfaceClas sLoader.java:25) [junit] at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:3 21) [junit] at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:2 66) [junit] at org.jmock.test.unit.lib.JavaReflectionImposteriser Tests.testCanMockTypesFromADynamicClassLoader(Java ReflectionImposteriserTests.java:38) I have no idea about this. I've applied two patches. One to use objectweb classes directly rather than from cglib, and one derived from the 2.6.0-RC2 release to support java 1.6. Any help would be appreciated. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- java-devel mailing list java-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel |
Trouble building jmock 2.5.1
On 08:49:36 AM Wednesday, May 11, 2011 Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I'm looking at packaging jmock 2.5.1. Package is here: > > http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/jmock-2.5.1-1.fc15.src.rpm > > Build log: > > http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/rpmbuild.log > > Error is during the tests: > > [junit] Testcase: > testCanMockTypesFromADynamicClassLoader(org.jmock. test.unit.lib.JavaReflect > ionImposteriserTests): Caused an ERROR > [junit] Invalid superclass index 0 in class file $UniqueTypeName$ > [junit] java.lang.ClassFormatError: Invalid superclass index 0 in > class file $UniqueTypeName$ > [junit] at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method) > [junit] at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java :634) > [junit] at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java :480) > [junit] at > org.jmock.test.unit.support.SyntheticEmptyInterfac eClassLoader.synthesiseIn > terface(SyntheticEmptyInterfaceClassLoader.java:43 ) [junit] at > org.jmock.test.unit.support.SyntheticEmptyInterfac eClassLoader.findClass(Sy > ntheticEmptyInterfaceClassLoader.java:25) [junit] at > java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:3 21) [junit] at > java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:2 66) [junit] at > org.jmock.test.unit.lib.JavaReflectionImposteriser Tests.testCanMockTypesFro > mADynamicClassLoader(JavaReflectionImposteriserTes ts.java:38) > > I have no idea about this. I've applied two patches. One to use > objectweb classes directly rather than from cglib, and one derived from > the 2.6.0-RC2 release to support java 1.6. It looks like the given test case doesn't support the class format used. Could it be that your java 1.6 patch missed some test cases? As jmock hasn't been in Fedora before I would have chosen 2.6.0-RC2 if it is supposed to handle java 1.6 classes Alex > > Any help would be appreciated. -- java-devel mailing list java-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel |
Trouble building jmock 2.5.1
> On 08:49:36 AM Wednesday, May 11, 2011 Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> Error is during the tests: >> >> * * *[junit] Testcase: >> testCanMockTypesFromADynamicClassLoader(org.jmock. test.unit.lib.JavaReflect >> ionImposteriserTests): Caused an ERROR >> * * *[junit] Invalid superclass index 0 in class file $UniqueTypeName$ >> * * *[junit] java.lang.ClassFormatError: Invalid superclass index 0 in >> class file $UniqueTypeName$ >> * * *[junit] * * at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method) >> * * *[junit] * * at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java :634) >> * * *[junit] * * at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java :480) >> * * *[junit] * * at >> org.jmock.test.unit.support.SyntheticEmptyInterfac eClassLoader.synthesiseIn >> terface(SyntheticEmptyInterfaceClassLoader.java:43 ) [junit] * * at >> org.jmock.test.unit.support.SyntheticEmptyInterfac eClassLoader.findClass(Sy >> ntheticEmptyInterfaceClassLoader.java:25) [junit] * * at >> java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:3 21) [junit] * * at >> java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:2 66) [junit] * * at >> org.jmock.test.unit.lib.JavaReflectionImposteriser Tests.testCanMockTypesFro >> mADynamicClassLoader(JavaReflectionImposteriserTes ts.java:38) >> >> I have no idea about this. *I've applied two patches. *One to use >> objectweb classes directly rather than from cglib, and one derived from >> the 2.6.0-RC2 release to support java 1.6. I think the problem depends on the version of asm you are using; the error is thrown on a call to a cglib method which your patch reroutes directly to asm. -- Guido Grazioli <guido.grazioli@gmail.com> Via Parri 11 48011 - Alfonsine (RA) Mobile: +39 347 1017202 (10-18) Key FP = 7040 F398 0DED A737 7337* DAE1 12DC A698 5E81 2278 Linked in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/guidograzioli -- java-devel mailing list java-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel |
Trouble building jmock 2.5.1
On 05/11/2011 06:00 AM, Guido Grazioli wrote:
>> On 08:49:36 AM Wednesday, May 11, 2011 Orion Poplawski wrote: >>> Error is during the tests: >>> >>> [junit] Testcase: >>> testCanMockTypesFromADynamicClassLoader(org.jmock. test.unit.lib.JavaReflect >>> ionImposteriserTests): Caused an ERROR >>> [junit] Invalid superclass index 0 in class file $UniqueTypeName$ >>> [junit] java.lang.ClassFormatError: Invalid superclass index 0 in >>> class file $UniqueTypeName$ >>> [junit] at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method) >>> [junit] at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java :634) >>> [junit] at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java :480) >>> [junit] at >>> org.jmock.test.unit.support.SyntheticEmptyInterfac eClassLoader.synthesiseIn >>> terface(SyntheticEmptyInterfaceClassLoader.java:43 ) [junit] at >>> org.jmock.test.unit.support.SyntheticEmptyInterfac eClassLoader.findClass(Sy >>> ntheticEmptyInterfaceClassLoader.java:25) [junit] at >>> java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:3 21) [junit] at >>> java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:2 66) [junit] at >>> org.jmock.test.unit.lib.JavaReflectionImposteriser Tests.testCanMockTypesFro >>> mADynamicClassLoader(JavaReflectionImposteriserTes ts.java:38) >>> >>> I have no idea about this. I've applied two patches. One to use >>> objectweb classes directly rather than from cglib, and one derived from >>> the 2.6.0-RC2 release to support java 1.6. > > I think the problem depends on the version of asm you are using; the error > is thrown on a call to a cglib method which your patch reroutes directly > to asm. > Probably. It appears that cglib out in the wild simply rebundles asm (via jarjar I think). On Fedora it dosn't, hence the need to use the original objectweb-asm namespace. 2.5.1 use cglib 2.1_3. F15 has cglib 2.2. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- java-devel mailing list java-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 03:06 AM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.