On 09:37 Mon 07 Mar , Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> Excerpts from Ward, David - 0663 - MITLL's message of Thu Mar 03 22:36:40 +0100 2011:
> > I know that people have asked in the past about removing gcj from Fedora
> > in favor of OpenJDK, and I'm aware that this has not happened for
> > reasons including architecture support on some platforms. I don't know
> > when this was assessed last, but I'm leaving that question alone for now.
> Actually we discussed this during our SIG meetings and recent changes
> to Java packaging guidelines reflect this. We are discouraging
> building with GCJ support, but these guidelines are relatively new so
> it will take some time for packages to be rebuilt with respect to new
> guidelines. My guess is F-16, partially also F-15.
There are some places where AOT is still needed e.g. ecj is much slower
when not using AOT.
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and IcedTea
PGP Key: F5862A37 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EA30 D855 D50F 90CD F54D 0698 0713 C3ED F586 2A37
java-devel mailing list