Lillian Angel wrote:
> Yes, we had issues with the VisualVM package since the NetBeans upgrade
> and needed to remove VisualVM temporarily. We may re-insert it in the
> future.
Thanks Lillian for the info.
In the meanwhile, is VisualVM available in one of the official repositories? By what name?
$> yum list *visualvm*
didn't find anything
cheers,
Harshad
--
fedora-devel-java-list mailing list
fedora-devel-java-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
02-13-2009, 07:55 AM
Andrew Haley
why does openjdk need to depend on netbeans?
Harshad wrote:
> Lillian Angel wrote:
>> Yes, we had issues with the VisualVM package since the NetBeans upgrade
>> and needed to remove VisualVM temporarily. We may re-insert it in the
>> future.
>
> Thanks Lillian for the info.
>
> In the meanwhile, is VisualVM available in one of the official repositories? By what name?
No; it doesn't build with the current NetBeans package.
Andrew.
--
fedora-devel-java-list mailing list
fedora-devel-java-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list