system-config-network
As a casual, but interested user, I do find the network configuration
confusing... I use fedora 10 (gnome) most of the time, and I can never remember which submenu to go to in order to set the hostname... Every once in a while, Network Manager behaves flaky and stops or won't start (I've seen this mainly in Ubuntu 8, 9.x) and then you can be stuck. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 19, 2010, at 7:49 PM, Chuck Anderson <cra@WPI.EDU> wrote: > Do we really need to keep this in the menu? Does anyone need > System->Administration->Network or Network Device Control now that we > have NetworkManager? > -- > desktop mailing list > desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop -- desktop mailing list desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop |
system-config-network
On 02/20/2010 02:49 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> Do we really need to keep this in the menu? Does anyone need > System->Administration->Network or Network Device Control now that we > have NetworkManager? > I, for one, do not use N-M unless on a laptop (wired and wireless interfaces). I prefer the old-fashioned way to connect and set up my Ethernet interfaces. And I bet there are others. -- desktop mailing list desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop |
system-config-network
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 02:41:25PM +0200, Aioanei Rares wrote:
> On 02/20/2010 02:49 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > Do we really need to keep this in the menu? Does anyone need > > System->Administration->Network or Network Device Control now that we > > have NetworkManager? > > > I, for one, do not use N-M unless on a laptop (wired and wireless > interfaces). I prefer the old-fashioned way to connect and set up my > Ethernet interfaces. And I bet there are others. Yes, but it is confusing to new users. We can still keep the command line system-config-network, I'm just advocating to hide/remove it from the menu of the Desktop spin for F13. NM has matured enough that I think it is about time to accept it as the "one default" in the menu. -- desktop mailing list desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop |
system-config-network
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 09:15 -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 02:41:25PM +0200, Aioanei Rares wrote: > > On 02/20/2010 02:49 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > > Do we really need to keep this in the menu? Does anyone need > > > System->Administration->Network or Network Device Control now that we > > > have NetworkManager? > > > > > I, for one, do not use N-M unless on a laptop (wired and wireless > > interfaces). I prefer the old-fashioned way to connect and set up my > > Ethernet interfaces. And I bet there are others. > > Yes, but it is confusing to new users. We can still keep the command > line system-config-network, I'm just advocating to hide/remove it from > the menu of the Desktop spin for F13. NM has matured enough that I > think it is about time to accept it as the "one default" in the menu. +1, I think having both network config utilities in the menus is a bad idea. Of course, it'd be best to have whichever one is actually appropriate to the current configuration present, but I don't think that's possible unless we adopt some messy wrapper approach? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- desktop mailing list desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop |
system-config-network
Adam Williamson (awilliam@redhat.com) said:
> +1, I think having both network config utilities in the menus is a bad > idea. Of course, it'd be best to have whichever one is actually > appropriate to the current configuration present, but I don't think > that's possible unless we adopt some messy wrapper approach? nm-connection-editor, when checking 'make connection available to all users', writes the same configuration files that s-c-network does. Bill -- desktop mailing list desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop |
system-config-network
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:13:34PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Adam Williamson (awilliam@redhat.com) said: > > +1, I think having both network config utilities in the menus is a bad > > idea. Of course, it'd be best to have whichever one is actually > > appropriate to the current configuration present, but I don't think > > that's possible unless we adopt some messy wrapper approach? > > nm-connection-editor, when checking 'make connection available to all > users', writes the same configuration files that s-c-network does. Yup, and it is already in the menu: System->Preferences->Network Connections -- desktop mailing list desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop |
system-config-network
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 21:12 -0500, Brad Banko wrote:
> As a casual, but interested user, I do find the network configuration > confusing... I use fedora 10 (gnome) most of the time, and I can never > remember which submenu to go to in order to set the hostname... > > Every once in a while, Network Manager behaves flaky and stops or > won't start (I've seen this mainly in Ubuntu 8, 9.x) and then you can > be stuck. Ubuntu 8 and 9.04 ship pretty old versions of NetworkManager that we haven't shipped in Fedora since F7/F8/F9. They aren't a good read of the state of NetworkManager for the past year or two. Dan > Sent from my iPhone > > On Feb 19, 2010, at 7:49 PM, Chuck Anderson <cra@WPI.EDU> wrote: > > > Do we really need to keep this in the menu? Does anyone need > > System->Administration->Network or Network Device Control now that we > > have NetworkManager? > > -- > > desktop mailing list > > desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop -- desktop mailing list desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop |
system-config-network
Is there something wrong with my Fedora-16/KDE setup,
or has this command become completely useless? It used to show me the various interfaces on my computer, with information which I could edit about them. Now I am offered a single window (with a border of circumflex-ed a's!) with 2 choices: Device configuration and DNS configuration. If I choose the first I am just shown the ethernet connection to my laptop, which I am not using, with no information about it except for its name "p2p1". DNS configuration just shows me the content of /etc/resolv.conf . -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College Dublin -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 02:01 PM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.