Hi all,
Excuse me - just to ask: What is the idea of polishing F12 while F10 and F11 have fairly low reliability (in working with OpenOffice for example).
Today I tried to do some a little bit more complex operations with OpenOffice Writer under F11 and 'went in the Dimension-X'.
Regards,
Christo Petkov
--- On Fri, 10/30/09, fedora-desktop-list-request@redhat.com <fedora-desktop-list-request@redhat.com> wrote:
From: fedora-desktop-list-request@redhat.com <fedora-desktop-list-request@redhat.com>
Subject: Fedora-desktop-list Digest, Vol 68, Issue 35
To: fedora-desktop-list@redhat.com
Date: Friday, October 30, 2009, 4:00 PM
Send Fedora-desktop-list mailing list
submissions to
*** fedora-desktop-list@redhat.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
*** https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
*** fedora-desktop-list-request@redhat.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
*** fedora-desktop-list-owner@redhat.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
specific
than "Re: Contents of Fedora-desktop-list digest..."
Today's Topics:
***1. [Fwd: F12 icon completeness issues] (Adam Williamson)
***2. Re: [Fwd: F12 icon completeness issues] (Matthias Clasen)
***3. Re: [Fwd: F12 icon completeness issues] (Adam Williamson)
***4. Re: [Fwd: F12 icon completeness issues] (Matthias Clasen)
***5. Re: [Fwd: F12 icon completeness issues] (James Laska)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:09:14 -0700
From: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Subject: [Fwd: F12 icon completeness issues]
To: fedora-desktop-list@redhat.com
Message-ID: <1256846954.2314.66.camel@adam.local.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
this seems an appropriate topic for desktop-list...
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Christopher Beland <beland@alum..mit.edu>
Subject: F12 icon completeness issues
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:52:47 -0400
Size: 6029
Url: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-desktop-list/attachments/20091029/3ec2a80e/attachment.mht
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:44:13 -0400
From: Matthias Clasen <mclasen@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: F12 icon completeness issues]
To: Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop
*** <fedora-desktop-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1256849053.1785.10.camel@planemask>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 13:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> this seems an appropriate topic for
desktop-list...
I don't think there is much to discuss, though.
Yes, the missing abrt icon is a problem. But the fact that not every
item in Places and System has an icon was our design decision, and is
not a bug in any way.
I don't see how those 'missing' icons could even theoretically be
considered a release blocker. They don't cause a problem in any way.
Matthias
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:01:30 -0700
From: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: F12 icon completeness issues]
To: Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop
*** <fedora-desktop-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1256850090.2314.75.camel@adam.local.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 16:44 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 13:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > this seems an appropriate topic for desktop-list...
>
> I don't think there is much to discuss, though.
>
> Yes, the missing abrt icon is a problem. But the fact that not every
> item in Places and System has an icon was our design decision, and is
> not a bug in any way..
>
> I don't see how those 'missing' icons could even theoretically be
> considered a release blocker. They don't cause a problem in any way.
I dunno, I didn't write those criteria. I guess the idea was to have
some kind of standard for final desktop polish. I guess my
question was
more or less what you answered above - whether this list knows why this
is in the release criteria, and whether you'd agree with it.
Though looking at it again, it's a 'should' not a 'must' issue. Which by
my understanding means it's not intended to actually be a blocker (only
things on the release criteria page with the keyword 'must' indicate
things we'd block for).
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:37:03 -0400
From: Matthias Clasen <mclasen@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: F12 icon completeness issues]
To: Discussions about development for the Fedora
desktop
*** <fedora-desktop-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1256902623.1832.5.camel@planemask>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 14:01 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I dunno, I didn't write those criteria. I guess the idea was to have
> some kind of standard for final desktop polish. I guess my question was
> more or less what you answered above - whether this list knows why this
> is in the release criteria, and whether you'd agree with it.
I was not involved in the creation of these criteria. It is obviously a
bit unfortunate if design decisions like the one to drop some icons from
the menus are not reflected in them.
As long as everybody is reasonable about this, it is not a big
problem.
Matthias
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:42:32 -0400
From: James Laska <jlaska@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: F12 icon completeness issues]
To: Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop
*** <fedora-desktop-list@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1256913752.2370.131.camel@localhost.localdomain >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 07:37 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 14:01 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > I dunno,
I didn't write those criteria. I guess the idea was to have
> > some kind of standard for final desktop polish. I guess my question was
> > more or less what you answered above - whether this list knows why this
> > is in the release criteria, and whether you'd agree with it.
>
> I was not involved in the creation of these criteria. It is obviously a
> bit unfortunate if design decisions like the one to drop some icons from
> the menus are not reflected in them.
We'll be looking to refresh the release criteria in the near future.
I'm not sure exactly when we'll kick that off, but we'll be sure to
solicit feedback from all groups.
Thanks,
James
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-desktop-list/attachments/20091030/c420546e/attachment.bin
------------------------------
--
Fedora-desktop-list mailing list
Fedora-desktop-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
End of Fedora-desktop-list Digest, Vol 68, Issue 35
************************************************** *
--
Fedora-desktop-list mailing list
Fedora-desktop-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
Fedora-desktop-list Digest, Vol 68, Issue 35
