Am 25.11.2010 22:19, schrieb Jef van Schendel:
> Agreed on the rushing, that's definitely an issue. However I'm not sure a
> compressed footer is the best thing to do, since that means we've got two
> different ones and it'll be even harder to get them consistent across all
> websites. Also, most of the links in your mockup footer are also in the
> header onwww.fpo. If we only want to have those, we could also use the
> existing menu bar somewhere, as in .
I rethought the footer-thing again and now I agree: such a footer *has*
to be consistent. But using the header bar from www.fpo isn't a good
thing because it overloads the whole site against the search field.
> I tried to get the search functionality front and center, without removing
> the footer in . We can easily make the footer stick to the bottom of the
> screen, so it gets out of the way but is still there if you need it. By
> putting the search bar right in the middle of the screen, it's still the
> most prominent object on the page.
> Another option is to hide the footer a bit. I tried making that div's
> position absolute and putting the top at 90%. Doing this, only the very top
> part is visible on your screen and the rest when you scroll down. I'm not
> sure that's a good option though, it looks quite strange, as if something
> went wrong.
Hiding the footer a bit is IMHO just like cutting it down like I did
which has the same effect as I stated above.
>> > The only additional function I'd add would be a link named "switch to
>> > daily start page" or so, which updates the browser home page to a
>> > start.fedoraproject.org variant as stated below.
>> > * start.fedoraproject.org
>> > On this site I'd place things like RSS feeds, tweets, rotating photo
>> > galleries etc. Something like a portal but only with aggregated content
>> > so no daily maintenance would be needed.
>> > Perhaps pushing planet.fpo unfiltered to this site should be rethought
>> > since there are sometimes quite useless postings like "i have voted" or
>> > so. Maybe someone should pick the 20-30 most "valuable" ones and tell
>> > the blog owners about the fact that their posts will appear on
>> > start.fpo. In this way a little quality assurance would be given.
> Actually there's already a page that has most of that, the Community page
> onwww.fpo. We designed that just as you describe, as a kind of hub for
> community information.
You talk about ? I like that page, but I wouldn't use it as my
browser home page. Might be some personal liking of mine. Because of
that I thought about a "standalone start page".
> Thus, I think it's best to keep all of that on the Community page, and
> remove the feeds from start.fpo again. It really adds too much noise IMO.
> Anyway, I'll give it some more thought next week.
> As for the Google topic, those are all valid points but it's probably
> something to discuss on a different list. For now, I think the content is
> good enough: everybody is familiar with Google, and the CC filters add a
> nice touch that for instance Firefox's search bar doesn't provide. I just
> want to give start.fpo a quick facelift.
mb: https://identi.ca/vinzv | https://twitter.com/vinzv
design-team mailing list