On Thursday, August 19, 2010 04:38:45 pm Martin Sourada wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 10:25 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > So, instead of having release specific themes, we are now switching the
> > non-release specific theme every release ? Doesn't make sense to me.
>
> I wasn't implying that. I proposed just one-time switch now. We either
> need a release specific plymouth or have one theme stay for a few
> releases, and since there's consensus to use release agnostic theme, I'm
> merely proposing that one to be spinfinity from now on and asking here
> on design if other people feel the same or not. The bug in F14's
> plymouth (and that message on test list) just prompted me to bring it
> up.

+1, release specific (preferred by me) or spinfinity.

R.

> > What annoys you in the current plymouth is just a bug that will be
> > addressed before the beta.
>
> I certainly hope so, yet I think spinfinity would still be a better
> option -- hence the suggestion for change.
>
> Martin

--
Jaroslav ŘeznÃ*k <jreznik@redhat.com>
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno

Office: +420 532 294 275
Mobile: +420 602 797 774
Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/
_______________________________________________
design-team mailing list
design-team@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team

On 18 August 2010 16:50, Dave Crossland <dave@lab6.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 18 August 2010 16:29, Adam Miller <maxamillion@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> Can I get a link to what spinfinity looks like? Google searches for it
>> are getting me nowhere.
>
> I'll try and post one tonight when I reboot

http://dave.lab6.com/acid/dump/2010/spinfinity.avi 10M
http://dave.lab6.com/acid/dump/2010/spinfinity1.jpg 2M
http://dave.lab6.com/acid/dump/2010/spinfinity2.jpg 2M
_______________________________________________
design-team mailing list
design-team@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team

On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 21:26 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
> Personally I'd prefer switching to spinfinity theme. It's simple and
> professional looking and it does not have any rendering glitches (tested
> myself on F12 and F14).
>
> Any thoughts on this?

+1 for spinfinity - (although I'd personally prefer a release-specific
theme )

-Emily

_______________________________________________
design-team mailing list
design-team@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team

Thu Aug 19 23:30:02 2010
Return-path: <centos-bounces@centos.org>
Envelope-to: tom@linux-archive.org
Delivery-date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 23:24:27 +0300
Received: from mail.centos.org ([72.26.200.202]:58449)
by s2.java-tips.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <centos-bounces@centos.org>)
id 1OmBf1-0006rg-2N
for tom@linux-archive.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 23:24:27 +0300
Received: from mail.centos.org (voxeldev.centos.org [127.0.0.1])
by mail.centos.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB3A6F8FA;
Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:11:44 -0400 (EDT)
X-Original-To: centos@centos.org
Delivered-To: centos@centos.org
Received: from ndjsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.122])
by mail.centos.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E74267B7F
for <centos@centos.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:11:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ndmsppt05.ndc.nasa.gov (ndmsppt05.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.0.104])
by ndjsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id A34F8A82AB
for <centos@centos.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:11:42 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ndmshub02.ndc.nasa.gov (ndmshub02-pub.ndc.nasa.gov
[198.117.0.161])
by ndmsppt05.ndc.nasa.gov (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7JLBbxL005108
for <centos@centos.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:11:37 -0500
Received: from NDMSSCC06.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.2.176]) by
ndmshub02.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.2.161]) with mapi;
Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:11:42 -0500
From: "Mayhall, Anthony J. (MSFC-ES53)[Dynamic Concepts Inc.]"
<anthony.j.mayhall@nasa.gov>
To: "centos@centos.org" <centos@centos.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:11:58 -0500
Thread-Topic: Installing on Intel EFI system
Thread-Index: Acs/4x6Fse3d55pxQKi71gWxnszlrw==
Message-ID: <C1A75370-0CF2-4BF6-8A4B-CB2421EFF6D1@nasa.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.0.10011, 1.0.148,
0.0.0000
definitions=2010-08-19_09:2010-08-19, 2010-08-19,
1970-01-01 signatures=0
Subject: [CentOS] Installing on Intel EFI system
X-BeenThere: centos@centos.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org>
List-Id: CentOS mailing list <centos.centos.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos>,
<mailto:centos-request@centos.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos>
List-Post: <mailto:centos@centos.org>
List-Help: <mailto:centos-request@centos.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos>,
<mailto:centos-request@centos.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: centos-bounces@centos.org
Errors-To: centos-bounces@centos.org

Can I install CentOS 5.4 on an Intel based system that is not an Itanium system? The system BIOS has support for EFI and can boot to an EDI shell.

Thanks,


Anthony Mayhall

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos