FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Build System

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 09-16-2010, 09:44 AM
Alan Franzoni
 
Default Mock umount all patch

Hello,
I'm sorry needing to push this but I think it's really useful and I
don't want it getting lost for no apparent reason.

There was this feature for which I created a ticket:

https://fedorahosted.org/mock/ticket/4

It was then discussed on the ml:

http://www.mail-archive.com/buildsys@lists.fedoraproject.org/msg00178.html

And it seemed all-right back then.

http://www.mail-archive.com/buildsys@lists.fedoraproject.org/msg00244.html

But still it was not applied.

I pushed it forward once more recently, in order to cope with some
recent modifications to the trunk:

http://www.mail-archive.com/buildsys@lists.fedoraproject.org/msg00420.html

Could it be applied now? Otherwise, if there's any pending issue,
please tell me and I'll fix it.

Thank you,

--
Alan Franzoni
--
contact me at public@[mysurname].eu
--
buildsys mailing list
buildsys@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/buildsys
 
Old 09-17-2010, 03:16 PM
Clark Williams
 
Default Mock umount all patch

On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:44:03 +0200
Alan Franzoni <mailing@franzoni.eu> wrote:

> Hello,
> I'm sorry needing to push this but I think it's really useful and I
> don't want it getting lost for no apparent reason.
>
> There was this feature for which I created a ticket:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/mock/ticket/4
>
> It was then discussed on the ml:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/buildsys@lists.fedoraproject.org/msg00178.html
>
> And it seemed all-right back then.
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/buildsys@lists.fedoraproject.org/msg00244.html
>
> But still it was not applied.
>
> I pushed it forward once more recently, in order to cope with some
> recent modifications to the trunk:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/buildsys@lists.fedoraproject.org/msg00420.html
>
> Could it be applied now? Otherwise, if there's any pending issue,
> please tell me and I'll fix it.
>

Alan,

I've applied your patch and it will be in the next mock releases (1.1.5
and 1.0.12). In the future though I'd appreciate it if you'd do this
via a Bugzilla entry.

Thanks,
Clark
--
buildsys mailing list
buildsys@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/buildsys
 
Old 09-17-2010, 03:39 PM
Alan Franzoni
 
Default Mock umount all patch

On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> wrote:
> I've applied your patch and it will be in the next mock releases (1.1.5
> and 1.0.12).

Thank you!

> In the future though I'd appreciate it if you'd do this
> via a Bugzilla entry.

I would, and I had already tried; but where?

At the bottom of this page:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock

The provided link

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora%20Hosted%20Projects&c omponent=mock

doesn't work; I just get a "Sorry, entering a bug into the product
Fedora Hosted Projects has been disabled." error message, and I can't
find "Fedora Hosted Projects" in the "all" view of Redhat Bugzilla:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?classification=__all

The only tracker I could access was fedorahosted Trac, and that I used.

If you're still able to enter new bugs there, I think it's because
you're a redhat employee; such behaviour must have been disabled
sometimes for normal - albeit registered - users.



--
Alan Franzoni
--
contact me at public@[mysurname].eu
--
buildsys mailing list
buildsys@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/buildsys
 
Old 09-17-2010, 04:50 PM
Clark Williams
 
Default Mock umount all patch

On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:39:05 +0200
Alan Franzoni <mailing@franzoni.eu> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> wrote:
> > I've applied your patch and it will be in the next mock releases (1.1.5
> > and 1.0.12).
>
> Thank you!
>
> > In the future though I'd appreciate it if you'd do this
> > via a Bugzilla entry.
>
> I would, and I had already tried; but where?
>
> At the bottom of this page:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock
>
> The provided link
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora%20Hosted%20Projects&c omponent=mock
>
> doesn't work; I just get a "Sorry, entering a bug into the product
> Fedora Hosted Projects has been disabled." error message, and I can't
> find "Fedora Hosted Projects" in the "all" view of Redhat Bugzilla:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?classification=__all
>
> The only tracker I could access was fedorahosted Trac, and that I used.
>
> If you're still able to enter new bugs there, I think it's because
> you're a redhat employee; such behaviour must have been disabled
> sometimes for normal - albeit registered - users.
>

Hmmm, I'll ask around.

I just prefer BZ since I have to monitor it for work and that means all
my bugs show up in one place.

Clark
--
buildsys mailing list
buildsys@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/buildsys
 
Old 09-17-2010, 04:51 PM
Mike McLean
 
Default Mock umount all patch

On 09/17/2010 11:39 AM, Alan Franzoni wrote:
>> In the future though I'd appreciate it if you'd do this
>> via a Bugzilla entry.
>
> I would, and I had already tried; but where?
>
> At the bottom of this page:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock
>
> The provided link
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora%20Hosted%20Projects&c omponent=mock
>
> doesn't work; I just get a "Sorry, entering a bug into the product
> Fedora Hosted Projects has been disabled." error message, and I can't
> find "Fedora Hosted Projects" in the "all" view of Redhat Bugzilla:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?classification=__all
>
> The only tracker I could access was fedorahosted Trac, and that I used.

This came up before:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/buildsys/2010-March/002972.html

Note you can also file against the mock package under Fedora in Bugzilla.

Agreed that the wiki page needs changing. I assume they shut that
product down because fedorahosted projects should use trac's bug tracker.

> If you're still able to enter new bugs there, I think it's because
> you're a redhat employee; such behaviour must have been disabled
> sometimes for normal - albeit registered - users.

Nope, I see the same thing.
--
buildsys mailing list
buildsys@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/buildsys
 
Old 09-17-2010, 05:28 PM
Alan Franzoni
 
Default Mock umount all patch

On 9/17/10 6:51 PM, Mike McLean wrote:
> This came up before:
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/buildsys/2010-March/002972.html

Yep; and it was after that message that I filed the bug on Fedorahosted
trac.

> Note you can also file against the mock package under Fedora in Bugzilla.

Ok, I hadn't thought about that. I suppose I can just file it against
rawhide if it's an enhancement and not a bug.

Thank you folks!

--
Alan Franzoni
contact me at public@[mysurname].eu
--
buildsys mailing list
buildsys@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/buildsys
 
Old 09-17-2010, 05:34 PM
Alan Franzoni
 
Default Mock umount all patch

On 9/17/10 6:51 PM, Mike McLean wrote:
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/buildsys/2010-March/002972.html

It's just after reading such reply AGAIN that I realize that I was
already given a proper suggestion. I think my mind was just ignoring the
second link, focusing on the first :-/

Sorry, again, and thank you for your support.

--
Alan Franzoni
contact me at public@[mysurname].eu
--
buildsys mailing list
buildsys@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/buildsys
 
Old 09-17-2010, 07:03 PM
Mike McLean
 
Default Mock umount all patch

On 09/17/2010 01:34 PM, Alan Franzoni wrote:
> On 9/17/10 6:51 PM, Mike McLean wrote:
>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/buildsys/2010-March/002972.html
>
> It's just after reading such reply AGAIN that I realize that I was
> already given a proper suggestion. I think my mind was just ignoring the
> second link, focusing on the first :-/
>
> Sorry, again, and thank you for your support.

No problem, the wiki page did have the wrong information after all. I've
changed it to reflect reality.
--
buildsys mailing list
buildsys@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/buildsys
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 06:54 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org