Board question regarding non-software goods.
First, my apologies for cross-posting.
Spot, Pam, et al: At today's Board meeting[0] there was some significant backlash to the proposed TM guidelines, specifically the non-software goods section. The principal issue the Board would like to understand is: What is the impact of not running requests for trademark approval for non-software goods through the yet to be created trac instance (as is currently the case). e.g. is there a risk to the trademarks from the lack of documentation of quantity, events distributed at, etc, or does this merely simplify record keeping/keep someone from looking at the various budget pages/meeting logs/mailing lists where these things are currently discussed/record. Additionally, a number of folks present at the Board meeting who are involved in the acquisition and distribution of Fedora swag were concerned with the additional overhead, and for clarification offered up the following workflow that already happens: Need for swag is discussed and agreed to by regional groups such as FAmNA, EMEA Ambassadors, in public. Designs either generated or proofed by Fedora Design (or are designs that have been generated or approved in the past) and are then ordered. The bill is subsequently paid by RHT (involving management approval of expense reports, auditing by finance etc). This presents the additional questions of: * Does RHT ultimately paying (and thus at least tacitly, if not explicitly approving of the usage) for the goods not make this TM usage on the part of RHT and thus not needing approval? * Is it permissible for the Board to delegate either to the various groups within Fedora that produce swag, or perhaps to the regional community RHT credit card holders, the ability to approve TM usage within a well defined swag/non-software goods category. * Despite the non-software goods section in the TM guidelines - swag has been produced without Board approval for at least the past 4 years - has there been a delegation of this authority already, or was perhaps the understanding that RHT footing the bill indicated RHT approval? [0] http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-02-22/fedora_board.2012-02-22-18.29.log.html _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board |
Board question regarding non-software goods.
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 17:44 -0500, David Nalley wrote:
> Need for swag is discussed and agreed to by regional groups such as > FAmNA, EMEA Ambassadors, in public. Designs either generated or > proofed by Fedora Design (or are designs that have been generated or > approved in the past) and are then ordered FWIW there has been more than a trivial amount of swag that has not gone through design team approval and print-ready artwork has not been proofed with the design team, resulting in incorrect colors (RGB instead of correct CMYK colorspace) and the wrong usage of fonts (usually due to not flattening fonts to paths) in the final product. For the most part, logo manipulations do go through either the logo queue or the Design team, but I have been disappointed in the past by designs with errors that could have been prevented. ~m _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board |
Board question regarding non-software goods.
2012/2/22 Máirín Duffy <duffy@fedoraproject.org>:
> On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 17:44 -0500, David Nalley wrote: >> Need for swag is discussed and agreed to by regional groups such as >> FAmNA, EMEA Ambassadors, in public. Designs either generated or >> proofed by Fedora Design (or are designs that have been generated or >> approved in the past) and are then ordered > > FWIW there has been more than a trivial amount of swag that has not gone > through design team approval and print-ready artwork has not been > proofed with the design team, resulting in incorrect colors (RGB instead > of correct CMYK colorspace) and the wrong usage of fonts (usually due to > not flattening fonts to paths) in the final product. For the most part, > logo manipulations do go through either the logo queue or the Design > team, but I have been disappointed in the past by designs with errors > that could have been prevented. That is true - I can think of a number of instances where that has been the case, though most of the examples I can think of seem to be a bit distant, but I've also been far more distant from the preparation of swag as well. --David _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board |
Board question regarding non-software goods.
----- Original Message -----
> On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 17:44 -0500, David Nalley wrote: > > Need for swag is discussed and agreed to by regional groups such as > > FAmNA, EMEA Ambassadors, in public. Designs either generated or > > proofed by Fedora Design (or are designs that have been generated > > or > > approved in the past) and are then ordered > > FWIW there has been more than a trivial amount of swag that has not > gone > through design team approval and print-ready artwork has not been > proofed with the design team, resulting in incorrect colors (RGB > instead > of correct CMYK colorspace) and the wrong usage of fonts (usually due > to > not flattening fonts to paths) in the final product. For the most > part, > logo manipulations do go through either the logo queue or the Design > team, but I have been disappointed in the past by designs with errors > that could have been prevented. The question is more about producing already approved/designed (by Design team) designs, mostly already produced before as if I understand the policy draft correctly - the approval is needed for *every* new order. I'm not questioning the need to go for approval from you design ninjas for a new designs. Like from Marketing Collateral [1] wiki. Even I think some designs there are already obsolete or does not match the current TM policy. It would probably makes sense to have authorized Marketing stuff with up-to-date artwork, following all logo/design guidelines/policies and say that's already pre-approved design that could be used for SWAG. And just notify Legal or whoever is interested (I think even for us it makes some sense to have statistics) with the information about of SWAG produced/distributed. Jaroslav [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing_collateral > ~m > > _______________________________________________ > advisory-board mailing list > advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board |
Board question regarding non-software goods.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik@redhat.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- >> On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 17:44 -0500, David Nalley wrote: >> > Need for swag is discussed and agreed to by regional groups such as >> > FAmNA, EMEA Ambassadors, in public. Designs either generated or >> > proofed by Fedora Design (or are designs that have been generated >> > or >> > approved in the past) and are then ordered >> >> FWIW there has been more than a trivial amount of swag that has not >> gone >> through design team approval and print-ready artwork has not been >> proofed with the design team, resulting in incorrect colors (RGB >> instead >> of correct CMYK colorspace) and the wrong usage of fonts (usually due >> to >> not flattening fonts to paths) in the final product. For the most >> part, >> logo manipulations do go through either the logo queue or the Design >> team, but I have been disappointed in the past by designs with errors >> that could have been prevented. > > The question is more about producing already approved/designed (by Design > team) designs, mostly already produced before as if I understand the > policy draft correctly - the approval is needed for *every* new order. My understanding of the requirements for every order from last weeks call is the quantity and locations need to be tracked to prove active and continued usage of the trademark by RHT which is part of the requirements for keeping the trademark. Peter _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board |
Board question regarding non-software goods.
Am Mittwoch, den 22.02.2012, 19:36 -0500 schrieb Máirín Duffy:
> On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 17:44 -0500, David Nalley wrote: > > Need for swag is discussed and agreed to by regional groups such as > > FAmNA, EMEA Ambassadors, in public. Designs either generated or > > proofed by Fedora Design (or are designs that have been generated or > > approved in the past) and are then ordered > > FWIW there has been more than a trivial amount of swag that has not gone > through design team approval Such as? I doubt that anybody but the design team has produced designs for our swag and I wonder if something that was produced by the design team needs an explicit approval from the very same team. > and print-ready artwork has not been > proofed with the design team, resulting in incorrect colors (RGB instead > of correct CMYK colorspace) Incorrect colors are a problem indeed. We are facing it nearly every we produce something, because most companies acceppt neither RGB nor CMYK but want Pantone. Is there anything we can do about this? > and the wrong usage of fonts (usually due to > not flattening fonts to paths) in the final product. For the most part, > logo manipulations do go through either the logo queue or the Design > team, but I have been disappointed in the past by designs with errors > that could have been prevented. Again, I am not aware of any swag design that did not come from the design team. Maybe some new team members need better knowledge of the guidelines or we need a more formal approval process there? Kind regards, Christoph _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board |
Board question regarding non-software goods.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Christoph Wickert
<christoph.wickert@googlemail.com> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 22.02.2012, 19:36 -0500 schrieb Máirín Duffy: >> On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 17:44 -0500, David Nalley wrote: >> > Need for swag is discussed and agreed to by regional groups such as >> > FAmNA, EMEA Ambassadors, in public. Designs either generated or >> > proofed by Fedora Design (or are designs that have been generated or >> > approved in the past) and are then ordered >> >> FWIW there has been more than a trivial amount of swag that has not gone >> through design team approval > > Such as? I doubt that anybody but the design team has produced designs > for our swag and I wonder if something that was produced by the design > team needs an explicit approval from the very same team. Please let's not enumerate mistakes that have been made. The fact is that mistakes have been made by both community produced and by Red Hat produced merchandise. Sometimes the error is our fault, sometimes it is the fault of the vendor. In every case where a mistake has been made we can learn to do our work better. But this surely is not the point of the proposed change to the guidelines so I think it is a digression, although it is important for us to all do better. >> and print-ready artwork has not been >> proofed with the design team, resulting in incorrect colors (RGB instead >> of correct CMYK colorspace) > > Incorrect colors are a problem indeed. We are facing it nearly every we > produce something, because most companies acceppt neither RGB nor CMYK > but want Pantone. Is there anything we can do about this? > >> and the wrong usage of fonts (usually due to >> not flattening fonts to paths) in the final product. For the most part, >> logo manipulations do go through either the logo queue or the Design >> team, but I have been disappointed in the past by designs with errors >> that could have been prevented. > > Again, I am not aware of any swag design that did not come from the > design team. Maybe some new team members need better knowledge of the > guidelines or we need a more formal approval process there? I am and I don't consider that a problem. The policy is that merchandise and any other use of the trademarks follow the usage guidelines. That does not require working with the design team to accomplish although that is often a good practice to follow, but it should not be a policy in my opinion. Here is a recent example of a new contributor trying to produce a new piece of promotional merchandise for the project in the early stages and the advice I gave him. http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ambassadors/2012-February/018993.html I had two suggestions for his frisbee idea. Get quotes and FAmNA will decided whether to proceed by approving funding and if that happens then I suggested having the design used checked by the design team to help us be confident it was compliant with the usage guidelines. The point though is that we comply with the usage guidelines, not that we check with the design team who are mostly other community members and who mostly aren't legal authorities. If tomorrow Mo proposed this and were no longer a member of the design team I think it would be a waste of time to tell her to go get her artwork approved by the design team and I would not have asked her to do that because I already have great confidence she knows what she is doing. I have issues with just about every point in the new policy draft related to ambassador produced promotional merchandise but I am eager to hear the legal reasoning behind them. I can make points now regarding workflow and the likelihood of our continued production of materials under the new guidelines (which I have great concerns about) but mostly I think I should wait to hear more first. I will say now that I think it is ridiculous that I be required to ask the Board permission to make a frisbee. I, along with other contributors, have been making these decisions for years. Had the proposed item been something inappropriate (which has never happened because ambassadors are very keen to represent Fedora in a positive way) I would have explained that it was inappropriate and why and we would not have approved funding so that would have been the end of it. From a workflow and end result perspective needing to get permission for a particular item from the Board wastes our time and in my opinion accomplishes nothing (although it may have some legal thing that it accomplishes that I can't speak to). John _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board |
Board question regarding non-software goods.
On 02/23/2012 08:08 AM, inode0 wrote:
I have issues with just about every point in the new policy draft related to ambassador produced promotional merchandise but I am eager to hear the legal reasoning behind them. You probably ought to ask on -legal list if you're genuinely interested in the legal justifications and requirements. IANAL but as I understand it, to protect the trademark, documented oversight on all uses of the mark is required. I'm sure we can come up with policies and procedures to ensure that happens while at the same time make it as simple and efficient as possible. For example, Paul kindly replied already http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/2012-February/011370.html that should address at least some of the concerns you raised. -- rex _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board |
Board question regarding non-software goods.
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 13:52 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Such as? I doubt that anybody but the design team has produced designs > for our swag and I wonder if something that was produced by the design > team needs an explicit approval from the very same team. As an example, there are very old, very outdated freedom / infinity / voice poster designs that I *still* see in event photos, replete with embarrassingly incorrect fonts. There have been various T-shirts and posters produced that I never saw discussed on the design-team list. The FUDcon Milan event collateral comes to mind here. There have been keychains and stickers produced that I never saw discussed on the design team list or brought up to the design team that, for instance, have the blue colors of the Fedora logo reversed. Even if someone on the design team does a mock up for you, that does not mean it is ready to be sent to a printer and it will turn out right. (case in point, the I |f) Fedora shirts. I did a mockup for them. Someone - I haven't the faintest idea who - took the mockup and had it printed. Without consulting design team or flattening the fonts to paths. The shirts could have looked really cool but instead they have entirely the wrong font and look a bit off. Someone on the design team who knows what they are doing needs to look at or produce print-ready artwork before it is sent to the printers to make sure these kinds of mistakes happen. Before spending X amount of $ where X is pretty large, double-check with someone on the design team to make sure the design is still current. Mockups, even if they are in SVG (especially if they are in SVG, because they cannot be in CMYK if they are SVG) are not print-ready. > Incorrect colors are a problem indeed. We are facing it nearly every we > produce something, because most companies accept neither RGB nor CMYK > but want Pantone. Is there anything we can do about this? I don't know which printers you are talking to who claim they can only accept Pantone spot colors, but if a printer offers Pantone spot colors, they will most certainly be able to cope with CMYK. Pantone is expensive, and is only possible with designs that have a minimum number of colors (we're talking, 1-5 colors) where you explicitly specify Pantone ink numbers per area of color. The only designs we would ever produce with Pantone spot colors (which we'd better prefer not to use seeing how proprietary Pantone is) are for designs that have two colors: Fedora Blue & Fedora Dark Blue. The Pantone numbers for these colors are in the logo usage guidelines and you can give the color numbers to the printers verbally and they should be able to handle them. Sometimes a design is produced in CMYK, btw, and something about it is modified - maybe the copyright year? Maybe a URL? Maybe the version number? But when it is saved out, it isn't saved as CMYK. So a previously color-correct and approved design is switched over to RGB. This has happened multiple times with our media art. > > and the wrong usage of fonts (usually due to > > not flattening fonts to paths) in the final product. For the most part, > > logo manipulations do go through either the logo queue or the Design > > team, but I have been disappointed in the past by designs with errors > > that could have been prevented. > > Again, I am not aware of any swag design that did not come from the > design team. Maybe some new team members need better knowledge of the > guidelines or we need a more formal approval process there? Maybe we need a more formal approval process. But there are definitely items getting produced that haven't been brought up to the design team at all so it is a problem. I mean, in the end, maybe it's not a big deal, but I feel very, very badly about the amount of money spent on purple Fedora things and things where the font is so obviously wrong - but as a designer I'm likely a lot more sensitive to these things than your average bear. That being said, I do think Fedora is worth getting these things right and they do add up over time to create an unnecessary unpolished / sloppy impression. I would be happy to put together a guide of 'things to check for before sending a design to printing' for anybody who is interested, maybe do a quick screencast or something? Does that sound helpful? Would people actually be willing to take a look and follow the pointers? Are there any specific questions you have about how print stuff works or why such and such accident happened and how to prevent it that I can make sure to cover? ~m _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board |
Board question regarding non-software goods.
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 08:08 -0600, inode0 wrote:
> The point though is that we comply with the usage guidelines, not that > we check with the design team who are mostly other community members > and who mostly aren't legal authorities. If tomorrow Mo proposed this > and were no longer a member of the design team I think it would be a > waste of time to tell her to go get her artwork approved by the design > team and I would not have asked her to do that because I already have > great confidence she knows what she is doing. Okay, so I just sent off a separate reply to Christoph's message before seeing this one (sorry) but I did want to clarify when I say someone should send such-and-such to the design team for approval, I don't mean that so much as to say you should go run over there and get some rubber stamp for the sake of getting a rubber stamp. I mean more you should have someone who understands the printing process and knows what to check for looking it over to avoid easily-prevented mistakes. Someone who has been working with the Fedora logo artwork long enough to be able to spot incorrect colors and fonts from a mile away. While such a person doesn't have to be on the Fedora design team, I don't actually know anybody who has this understanding of the Fedora logo who isn't on the Fedora design team or at least who doesn't watch the team mailing list. Those sorts of things are going to be extremely difficult for someone new to the project to check for / understand on their own. Things to look for: - Is the correct font being used? (Cantarell for body text, Comfortaa for headlines / slugs) - Are all fonts converted to paths or otherwise embedded? - Is the colorspace set to CMYK? - Are the Fedora logo colors reflecting the correct values? The four foundations' / FUDcon colors? - Has the logo been modified in any way that isn't explicitly approved? Things to look for here include keylines and borders (not allowed), mixing with other logos (not allowed), spacing issues (bad), has the logo been scaled so the 'TM' marks are unreadable (bad)? - Is the file format correct and to the printer's specifications? If applicable, are appropriate bleeds and crop marks set in the file? With the frisbee design, one glance at the mockup and I can see the colors used are not correct. ~m _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27 PM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.