On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 13:26:09 -0400,
Richard Fontana <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 12:23:59PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> > A number of people caught an issue in the eligibility configuration
> > for voters in the Board Election. Per the Board's Succession
> > Planning document this election is open to any person in the Fedora
> > Accounts System who has completed the CLA.
> Just a nonsubstantive issue of terminology: there is no more CLA. We
> should not refer to the FPCA as a "CLA" since that would be inaccurate.
Yes and no. This was referring to specific groups that people are in and
the specific groups are cla_fedora and cla_done. There is a group
cla_fpca, but we aren't ready to use it for this election. (I'm not sure
if cla_fpca is intended to just handle the transition or if it was intended to
It may be that eventually the names of these groups should be changed, but
that should be done carefully, so as not to break things that have the
old names hardwired.
advisory-board mailing list