On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 12:22:37 -0400,
Máirín Duffy <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 11:13 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 18:24:33 -0400,
> > Máirín Duffy <email@example.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > It seems like the convo kind of peters out here on the list , so
> > > let's do a live chat on IRC and see what we come up with. Here's some
> > > times during the rest of this week and early next week. Can you make any
> > > of them?
> > Are you going to do anything to capture a summary doing the irc chat? For
> > FADs we have used gobby and/or wiki pages to capture stuff.
> Yeh I was thinking about doing meetingbot + wikipages. Although a gobby
> session might be helpful too, no?
In previous FADs gobby was used when multiple people were working on
the same task at the same time. Wikis were used when people split off
to do there own stuff and then were presented to the group after the
agreed working time.
I don't know how this meeting is going to work, so I am not sure which would
be better for during the meeting. Having the wiki for presenting the results
seems desireable. For gobby it was expected that you have an FAS account.
That might be an overly strict limitation for the meeting if you are expecting
casual users to participate.
> I only have one time slot respondent so far, I'm hoping more folks sign
I wasn't sure if I was going to be a big asset, so I figured I would wait
and see when the meeting was and then show up if there wasn't a conflict
with something else. Besides, I don't like that calendar tool. I have to
advisory-board mailing list