FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > EXT3 Users

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 08-13-2010, 10:00 AM
Ralf Hildebrandt
 
Default Squid and first-level subdirectories & second-level subdirectories on ext3/4

Squid, a proxy, is by its nature, storing large amounts of relatively
small files in it's cache.

As config optins it's offering:

# 'Level-1' is the number of first-level subdirectories which
# will be created under the 'Directory'. The default is 16.
#
# 'Level-2' is the number of second-level subdirectories which
# will be created under each first-level directory. The default
# is 256.

Meaning one has

/squid-cache/(16 dirs)/(256 dirs)/(the small files)

so the total number of small files in the cache is (hopefully) evenly
distributed to 16*256 directories.

But is that optimal for an ext3/4 filesystem? What is the point of
using 16 for the first level and 256 for the second?

Wouldn't 64*64 (which equals 16*256) be better when it comes to
finding the files on disk?

--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962
ralf.hildebrandt@charite.de | http://www.charite.de


_______________________________________________
Ext3-users mailing list
Ext3-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 08:50 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org