Recommended max. limit of number of files per directory?
Hello,
In the past (i.e. Ext2), the performance of file system will get worse if too many files (e.g. > 10K) under same directory, is it still the same for Ext3? Since I have a web server which contains a lot of user uploaded photos, currently I have already create directory hierarchy to avoid the performance issue with the file system, but I want to know if any exact / tested figures? Thanks. _______________________________________________ Ext3-users mailing list Ext3-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users |
Recommended max. limit of number of files per directory?
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 01:02:27 +0800,
howard chen <howachen@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > In the past (i.e. Ext2), the performance of file system will get worse > if too many files (e.g. > 10K) under same directory, is it still the > same for Ext3? If you turn on directory hashing it scales better but eventually performance will still tank. You can use tune2fs to see how it is set and change it if necessay. _______________________________________________ Ext3-users mailing list Ext3-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users |
Recommended max. limit of number of files per directory?
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to> wrote: > If you turn on directory hashing it scales better but eventually > performance will still tank. You can use tune2fs to see how it is set and > change it if necessay. > Yes, but I want to know if any testings was performed before? e.g. Ext3 start to suck when number of files under the same directory exceed X files. _______________________________________________ Ext3-users mailing list Ext3-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 01:37 AM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.